netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netfilter: marking IPv6 packets sends them to the wrong interface
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:10:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3DA48A.2020605@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110124143518.GA2616@darkside.kls.lan>

Am 24.01.2011 15:35, schrieb Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:46:57PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> On 23.01.2011 13:21, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>>> Without marking everything runs as it should be.
>>> Marking eth0 packets results in all advertisements transmitted via eth1.
>>> The behaviour goes back to normal as soon as the marking disappears.
>>> I also tried marking with 0xff00 instead of 1 - same results.
>> That probably means that we're not using the correct keys
>> when rerouting in ip6_route_me_harder(). Just for testing,
>> please try to disable the ip6_route_me_harder() call in
>> net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_mangle.c::ip6t_mangle_out().
> 
> Yes, disabling the ip6_route_me_harder() call in ip6t_mangle_out()
> results in the advertisements being transmitted on the correct
> interfaces

Thanks. The problem appears to be that ip6_route_me_harder()
only uses the socket's oif for the route lookup when the
socket is bound to an interface, but radvd uses IPV6_PKTINFO
to specify the outgoing interface.

I guess netfilter shouldn't be overriding IPV6_PKTINFO, but
we unfortunately have neither an indication of this nor the
original route lookup keys available at the time the packet
is rerouted.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-24 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-23 12:21 netfilter: marking IPv6 packets sends them to the wrong interface Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-01-24 13:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-24 14:35   ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-01-24 16:10     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2011-01-24 17:02       ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-01-24 17:50         ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D3DA48A.2020605@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).