From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: fix compiler warnings Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:51:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4D3ED568.8080009@trash.net> References: <1295930418-14980-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com> <20110125050535.GB7183@verge.net.au> <4D3EA526.5030704@trash.net> <20110125130933.GA2841@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Changli Gao , Wensong Zhang , Julian Anastasov , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110125130933.GA2841@verge.net.au> Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 25.01.2011 14:09, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:25:42AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> On 25.01.2011 06:05, Simon Horman wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:40:18PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote: >>>> Fix compiler warnings when IP_VS_DBG() isn't defined. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao >>> >>> Thanks, I will queue this up for when nf-next-2.6 is open again. >> >> It's already open. >> > > Hi Patrick, > > I'm a little unsure how you would like me to differentiate > between fixes for 2.6.38 - e.g. my previous two pull requests. > And patches intended for 2.6.39. Oh, I thought those were intended for -next because it included a netns fix. Best is to just state the intended tree in your pull request. > In any case I will send a pull request that includes > Changli's change against nf-next-2.6. Thanks.