From: Pierre Chifflier <chifflier@wzdftpd.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ebtables_nfqueue: missing structure afinfo
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:22:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D49AEFC.4040203@wzdftpd.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3EA72B.7000509@trash.net>
On 01/25/2011 11:34 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On 24.01.2011 21:55, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm still working on a module to add the NFQUEUE target to ebtables.
>>
>> So far, I've been able to split the work on two parts: sending the
>> packets to nfqueue, and re-inject them after a verdict. I'll split
>> questions on separate emails.
>>
>> Adding the NFQUEUE target is not a difficult task (making the
>> ebt_do_tables return NF_QUEUE_NR(queue_num)), however this won't work
>> since the __nf_queue() function [1] requires an afinfo structure :
>> 132 afinfo = nf_get_afinfo(pf);
>> 133 if (!afinfo)
>> 134 goto err_unlock;
>>
>> Since there is no afinfo structure for AF_BRIDGE, this won't work.
>>
>> I tried adding a dummy (empty) afinfo structure and registering it in
>> ebtables_init(), but that does not look like a clean solution ...
>>
>> What would be the best way (in order to be proposed mainstream) to do
>> that ? The afinfo structure seems to be called to save the route (and
>> then restored when re-injecting), I'm not sure yet if this is necessary
>> for AF_BRIDGE packets.
>
> No, I don't think so either. I'd simply make the afinfo handling
> in nf_queue.c optional, we can't get packets for non-existant
> address families anyways.
Thanks Patrick,
I've spent a few days trying to make it optional (in nf_queue.c,
function __nf_queue), however I have a weird problem:
If I remove the test for afinfo (and ensure that the pointer is not used
if null), everything seems to work fine.
However, when I use a userspace program (always returning NF_ACCEPT), I
got a fatal kernel oops (or panic) regarding packets.
According to the info displayed, it seems to be sometimes in
br_handle_frame, at
this point:
case BR_STATE_FORWARDING:
rhook = rcu_dereference(br_should_route_hook);
if (rhook) {
if ((*rhook)(skb))
inside the (*rhook) call.
Sometimes it's in netlink_unicast (unknown location), always when
reinjecting packet.
I tried to get more info with kgdb, but without much success:
#2 0xc11d1adc in skb_release_all (skb=0xdf1ed600) at net/core/skbuff.c:403
#3 __kfree_skb (skb=0xdf1ed600) at net/core/skbuff.c:417
#4 0xc11d1bdb in kfree_skb (skb=0xdf1ed600) at net/core/skbuff.c:438
#5 0xc11ee4d1 in netlink_unicast (ssk=0xdbf15c00, skb=<value optimized
out>,
pid=<value optimized out>, nonblock=0) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:921
Any idea on what could cause this ? AFAICT, it was not happening when I
used a fake afinfo structure.
Thanks,
Pierre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-24 20:55 ebtables_nfqueue: missing structure afinfo Pierre Chifflier
2011-01-25 10:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-02 19:22 ` Pierre Chifflier [this message]
2011-02-02 22:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-03 14:32 ` WIP/RFC: add new module ebt_NFQUEUE for ebtables Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-03 20:19 ` Bart De Schuymer
2011-02-04 10:05 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 13:20 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-03 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] Make the afinfo structure optional in nf_queue and nf_reinject Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 14:15 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-03 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] bridge: add support for the EBT_QUEUE target Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-03 14:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] bridge: add new target NFQUEUE for ebtables Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 13:40 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:41 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <4D5104C4.3010105@edenwall.com>
[not found] ` <4D59C047.5050404@trash.net>
2011-02-16 16:57 ` [RFH] " Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-17 10:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-17 13:37 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-18 13:42 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D49AEFC.4040203@wzdftpd.net \
--to=chifflier@wzdftpd.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).