netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Chifflier <chifflier@wzdftpd.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ebtables_nfqueue: missing structure afinfo
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:22:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D49AEFC.4040203@wzdftpd.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3EA72B.7000509@trash.net>

On 01/25/2011 11:34 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On 24.01.2011 21:55, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm still working on a module to add the NFQUEUE target to ebtables.
>>
>> So far, I've been able to split the work on two parts: sending the
>> packets to nfqueue, and re-inject them after a verdict. I'll split
>> questions on separate emails.
>>
>> Adding the NFQUEUE target is not a difficult task (making the
>> ebt_do_tables return NF_QUEUE_NR(queue_num)), however this won't work
>> since the __nf_queue() function [1] requires an afinfo structure :
>> 132         afinfo = nf_get_afinfo(pf);
>> 133         if (!afinfo)
>> 134                 goto err_unlock;
>>
>> Since there is no afinfo structure for AF_BRIDGE, this won't work.
>>
>> I tried adding a dummy (empty) afinfo structure and registering it in
>> ebtables_init(), but that does not look like a clean solution ...
>>
>> What would be the best way (in order to be proposed mainstream) to do
>> that ? The afinfo structure seems to be called to save the route (and
>> then restored when re-injecting), I'm not sure yet if this is necessary
>> for AF_BRIDGE packets.
> 
> No, I don't think so either. I'd simply make the afinfo handling
> in nf_queue.c optional, we can't get packets for non-existant
> address families anyways.

Thanks Patrick,

I've spent a few days trying to make it optional (in nf_queue.c,
function __nf_queue), however I have a weird problem:
If I remove the test for afinfo (and ensure that the pointer is not used
if null), everything seems to work fine.
However, when I use a userspace program (always returning NF_ACCEPT), I
got a fatal kernel oops (or panic) regarding packets.
According to the info displayed, it seems to be sometimes in
br_handle_frame, at
this point:
	case BR_STATE_FORWARDING:
		rhook = rcu_dereference(br_should_route_hook);
		if (rhook) {
			if ((*rhook)(skb))

inside the (*rhook) call.

Sometimes it's in netlink_unicast (unknown location), always when
reinjecting packet.

I tried to get more info with kgdb, but without much success:
#2  0xc11d1adc in skb_release_all (skb=0xdf1ed600) at net/core/skbuff.c:403
#3  __kfree_skb (skb=0xdf1ed600) at net/core/skbuff.c:417
#4  0xc11d1bdb in kfree_skb (skb=0xdf1ed600) at net/core/skbuff.c:438
#5  0xc11ee4d1 in netlink_unicast (ssk=0xdbf15c00, skb=<value optimized
out>,
    pid=<value optimized out>, nonblock=0) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:921

Any idea on what could cause this ? AFAICT, it was not happening when I
used a fake afinfo structure.

Thanks,
Pierre

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-02 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-24 20:55 ebtables_nfqueue: missing structure afinfo Pierre Chifflier
2011-01-25 10:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-02 19:22   ` Pierre Chifflier [this message]
2011-02-02 22:59     ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-03 14:32       ` WIP/RFC: add new module ebt_NFQUEUE for ebtables Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-03 20:19         ` Bart De Schuymer
2011-02-04 10:05         ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:07           ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 13:20             ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:21               ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-03 14:32       ` [PATCH 1/3] Make the afinfo structure optional in nf_queue and nf_reinject Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:27         ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 14:15           ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-03 14:32       ` [PATCH 2/3] bridge: add support for the EBT_QUEUE target Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-03 14:32       ` [PATCH 3/3] bridge: add new target NFQUEUE for ebtables Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:25         ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 13:40           ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:41             ` Patrick McHardy
     [not found]               ` <4D5104C4.3010105@edenwall.com>
     [not found]                 ` <4D59C047.5050404@trash.net>
2011-02-16 16:57                   ` [RFH] " Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-17 10:47                     ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-17 13:37                       ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-18 13:42                         ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D49AEFC.4040203@wzdftpd.net \
    --to=chifflier@wzdftpd.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).