From: Pierre Chifflier <chifflier@edenwall.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Make the afinfo structure optional in nf_queue and nf_reinject
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:15:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4C0A14.2070402@edenwall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4BFED9.7090605@trash.net>
On 02/04/2011 02:27 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On 03.02.2011 15:32, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
>> Packets coming from the bridge do not have an afinfo registered,
>> so make the call to get the structure optional.
>
> This patch looks fine to me.
>
> Regarding your crash - in what chain are you queueing the packet?
> We also need the exact backtrace.
The problem is that I must be running out of luck, but since today at
the moment the bridges goes in forwarding mode, I always got an oops.
Here's all the information I have, in hope it'll be useful.
Here is the backtrace (taken from kgdb):
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -2]
0x14488b55 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x14488b55 in ?? ()
#1 0xc128e506 in br_handle_frame (skb=0xd79aad80) at
net/bridge/br_input.c:181
#2 0xc11e3b7c in __netif_receive_skb (skb=0xd79aad80) at
net/core/dev.c:3085
#3 0xc11e754d in netif_receive_skb (skb=0xd79aad80) at net/core/dev.c:3179
#4 0xe0cbdf4d in ?? ()
#5 0xc11e7adf in net_rx_action (h=<value optimized out>)
at net/core/dev.c:3727
#6 0xc1034319 in __do_softirq () at kernel/softirq.c:238
#7 0xc1004056 in call_on_stack () at arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:66
#8 do_softirq () at arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:176
#9 0xc10341f4 in irq_exit () at kernel/softirq.c:328
#10 0xc1003893 in do_IRQ (regs=<value optimized out>)
at arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247
#11 0xc1002e30 in ?? () at arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S:825
#12 0xc101b6cf in native_safe_halt ()
at /home/pollux/build/nf-next-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:49
#13 0xc1007ec0 in arch_safe_halt ()
at /home/pollux/build/nf-next-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:110
#14 default_idle () at arch/x86/kernel/process.c:385
#15 0xc1001aa0 in cpu_idle () at arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c:114
#16 0xc12a4f94 in rest_init () at init/main.c:454
#17 0xc14058d3 in start_kernel () at init/main.c:704
#18 0xc14050d2 in i386_start_kernel () at arch/x86/kernel/head32.c:78
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#19 0x00000000 in ?? ()
On the screen, I have only a very few information, only that bridge is
entering forwarding state, and that last sysfs file is
/sys/devices/virtual/net/lo/operstate
The commands I used to setup the bridge are:
brctl addbr br0
brctl stp br0 off
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth1
ifconfig eth0 up
ifconfig eth1 up
ifconfig br0 up
At this point, I got the problem reported in the backtrace.
If that may be important, my test setup is using 2 VMs (using KVM)
[test client (debian squeeze)] -> [ebtables (nf-next-2.6)] -> real network
I start the 2 VMs and setup the bridge, then boom.
The following lines are not related to the backtrace, since it generally
happens *before* I can even add an ebtables rule.
To add a test rule, I just use
ebtables -A FORWARD -j nfqueue
Running a Python program to listen on the queue. I can provide it, the
most important lines are
q.set_callback(cb)
q.fast_open(1, AF_BRIDGE)
The callback:
def cb(i,payload):
payload.set_verdict(nfqueue.NF_ACCEPT)
Thanks,
Pierre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-04 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-24 20:55 ebtables_nfqueue: missing structure afinfo Pierre Chifflier
2011-01-25 10:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-02 19:22 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-02 22:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-03 14:32 ` WIP/RFC: add new module ebt_NFQUEUE for ebtables Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-03 20:19 ` Bart De Schuymer
2011-02-04 10:05 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 13:20 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-03 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] Make the afinfo structure optional in nf_queue and nf_reinject Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 14:15 ` Pierre Chifflier [this message]
2011-02-03 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] bridge: add support for the EBT_QUEUE target Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-03 14:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] bridge: add new target NFQUEUE for ebtables Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-04 13:40 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-04 13:41 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <4D5104C4.3010105@edenwall.com>
[not found] ` <4D59C047.5050404@trash.net>
2011-02-16 16:57 ` [RFH] " Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-17 10:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-17 13:37 ` Pierre Chifflier
2011-02-18 13:42 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D4C0A14.2070402@edenwall.com \
--to=chifflier@edenwall.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).