From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 3 (netfilter) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:09:43 +0100 Message-ID: <4D52BC47.8080709@trash.net> References: <20110203160034.44ae3247.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110204111511.1f4d6706.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <4D524079.1000908@trash.net> <4D52B810.403@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Rothwell , netdev , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jozsef Kadlecsik To: Randy Dunlap Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D52B810.403@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Am 09.02.2011 16:51, schrieb Randy Dunlap: > On 02/08/11 23:21, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> Am 04.02.2011 20:15, schrieb Randy Dunlap: >>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:00:34 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Changes since 20110202: >>> >>> When SYSCTL and PROC_FS and NETFILTER_NETLINK are not enabled: >>> >>> net/built-in.o: In function `try_to_load_type': >>> ip_set_core.c:(.text+0x3ab49): undefined reference to `nfnl_unlock' >>> ip_set_core.c:(.text+0x3ab4e): undefined reference to `nfnl_lock' >> >> Does this patch fix the problem? > > Yes, it does. Thanks. > > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap > Thanks, I'll push it upstream with my next batch of patches.