From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: conntrack -L shows nothing Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:58:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4D7CBF5F.20005@netfilter.org> References: <4D7CA71D.8040009@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:45772 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754261Ab1CMM6L (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2011 08:58:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 13/03/11 13:54, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Sunday 2011-03-13 12:14, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>> >>> I have observed a really odd issue, whereby running Linux 2.6.37.{0,1,2} >>> would cause `conntrack -L` to show nothing despite >>> /proc/net/nf_conntrack clearly having entries. Furthermore, the >>> functionality is restored in Patrick's nf-next that currently carries >>> 2.6.38-rc1, so there might have been a bug fix I am not aware about. >>> .config is the same in either case, and the nfnetlink modules are >>> loaded. >>> >>> (Unfortunately, bisecting between 2.6.37 and 38-rc1 is problematic >>> because it can step through Nick Piggin's VFS changes that, at some >>> points, can cause an oops.) >> >> Does cba85b532e4aabdb97f44c18987d45141fd93faa fix your problem? > > It does, thanks. thanks for confirming Jan. I have already sent this to -stable.