netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] libxt_rateest: avoid optional arguments
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:14:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDB68DB.4040000@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1105240943200.13058@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>

On 24.05.2011 10:03, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 2011-05-24 08:46, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>> On 23.05.2011 16:39, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> Optional arguments make parsing unnecessarily harder - even more so
>>> than two-args. Right now, rateest even crashes because of it.
>>>
>>>  static const struct option rateest_opts[] = {
> [...]
>>> -	{.name = "rateest-bps1",  .has_arg = false, .val = OPT_RATEEST_BPS1},
>>> +	{.name = "rateest-bps1",  .has_arg = true, .val = OPT_RATEEST_BPS1},
> [...]
>>
>> This appears to be breaking backwards compatibility.
> 
> Admittedly yes, though the fact that this has remained unseen for so
> long suggests that the potential user base is very small or not yet
> existing.

I'm pretty sure this used to work at some point. Let me check history.

> In my time with users in IRC, I notice that they in particular prefer
> hard stops in parsing over silent upgrades of rules[1], so as to
> actually become aware of the change upfront. As such, I believe the
> impact is well justified.

Well, if it really was broken from the beginning I'm fine of course,
but I don't think that's case.

> [1] i.e. `diff -u rules <(xtables-main save6)` is supposed to yield
> no diff except for counters
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-24  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-23 14:39 option parsing, run 9 Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 01/13] libxtables: retract _NE types and use a flag instead Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 02/13] libipt_REDIRECT: "--to-ports" is not mandatory Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 03/13] libxt_quota: readd missing XTOPT_PUT request Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 04/13] libxt_quota: make sure uint64 is not truncated Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 05/13] libxtables: check for negative numbers in xtables_strtou* Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 06/13] libxt_rateest: streamline case display of units Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 07/13] doc: add some coded option examples to libxt_hashlimit Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 08/13] doc: make usage of libxt_rateest more obvious Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 09/13] doc: clarify that -p all is a special keyword only Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 10/13] libxt_rateest: avoid optional arguments Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-24  6:46   ` Patrick McHardy
2011-05-24  8:03     ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-24  8:14       ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2011-05-24  8:51         ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-24 12:49           ` Patrick McHardy
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 11/13] libxt_rateest: fix rateest save operation Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 12/13] libxt_rateest: use guided option parser Jan Engelhardt
2011-05-23 14:39 ` [PATCH 13/13] libxt_ipvs: restore network-byte order Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DDB68DB.4040000@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).