From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: The glorious NFCT "none" helper Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:09:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4DEE06F8.2080909@trash.net> References: <1305757266-8730-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> <4DDA6F53.9060809@trash.net> <4DDA8184.3060407@netfilter.org> <4DDA8793.7010203@netfilter.org> <4DDB5901.2090607@trash.net> <4DDC00FF.6040405@netfilter.org> <4DEDFC36.6070301@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Engelhardt , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:50555 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751966Ab1FGLJw (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:09:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4DEDFC36.6070301@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07.06.2011 12:23, Patrick McHardy wrote: > On 24.05.2011 21:03, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >> BTW, not related with this patch but I'd like to fix the current issue >> with the userspace expectation support problem, still don't like my >> patches to add a template and set one flag to explicitly tell conntrack >> to allocate the helper CT extension? > > This is too much exposure of implementation in my opinion, userspace > shouldn't have to care about extension areas. I'll have another look > at your patches to see if I can come up with an alternative. I couldn't come up with anything reasonable that would be better than your approach, so let's do that.