From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] netfilter: nfqueue: batch verdict support
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:10:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E243EF3.3010009@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110707134552.GX16021@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc>
On 07.07.2011 15:45, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
>> On 10.06.2011 00:14, Florian Westphal wrote:
>>> Introduces a new nfnetlink type that applies a given
>>> verdict to all queued packets with an id <= the id in the verdict
>>> message.
>>>
>>> If a mark is provided it is applied to all matched packets.
>>>
>>> This reduces the number of verdicts that have to be sent.
>>> Applications that make use of this feature need to maintain
>>> a timeout to send a batchverdict periodically to avoid starvation.
>>
>> Thanks Florian. Do you have any throughput numbers with this patch?
>
> I re-ran some tests via lo, with Eric Dumazets
> "netfilter: nfqueue: assert monotonic packet ids" patch applied on top of
> a 2.6.39.2 kernel.
>
> With "one accept per packet", the rest program needs
> about two minutes to process 10000000 1024-Byte udp packets
> sent via lo (queueing via
> -t mangle -I INPUT -i lo -p udp -m udp --dport 6666 -j NFQUEUE --queue-num 0
> ; no other queueing rules active)
>
> When sending batch accept verdicts for every tenth packet received,
> run time was reduced to about 72 seconds.
>
> I ran this several times and the results were similar.
>
> Just to be sure I also tried with the Erics RCU patch applied but I
> did not see any changes (not surprising because nfnl_mutex should
> not cause contention in the "single queue" case).
Could you resend the patches rebased to Eric's nfnetlink_queue
changes please (I just pushed them out)? Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-18 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 22:14 [PATCH next] netfilter: nfqueue: batch verdict support Florian Westphal
2011-07-03 10:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-03 19:23 ` Florian Westphal
2011-07-19 9:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-07-05 13:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-07-05 15:52 ` Florian Westphal
2011-07-07 13:45 ` Florian Westphal
2011-07-11 9:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-07-18 14:10 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E243EF3.3010009@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).