netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iptables branch management
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:58:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E68D823.60306@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1109081610030.6362@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>

Am 08.09.2011 16:41, schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
> 
> On Thursday 2011-09-08 14:52, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>
>>> Nothing wrong, it just has not been done consistently or at all in the 
>>> past. I believe it does not hurt to go ahead with this, also since I am 
>>> statistically taking care of most submissions these days anyway.
>>
>> What has been done in the past doesn't really matter, we can of course
>> agree to have a stable branch when needed. But I don't see the point of
>> having a stable branch as long as it doesn't contain any fixes.
> 
> Oh we are nicely accumulating fixes & trivials already - do not worry 
> about that. Just let me pull this off, all it means is that
> there is another branch head on iptables.git, and something convenient 
> for the release manager to tag should the need arise for a .y release. 
> Users already seem to like the idea[1].
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=131499886708085&w=2
> 

Sure, go ahead.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-08 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-02 14:20 iptables branch management Jan Engelhardt
2011-09-02 21:27 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-09-05 17:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-09-08 10:05   ` Patrick McHardy
2011-09-08 11:59     ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-09-08 12:52       ` Patrick McHardy
2011-09-08 14:41         ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-09-08 14:58           ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2011-09-09  9:31           ` Peter Volkov
2011-09-09 11:07             ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E68D823.60306@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).