From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gao feng Subject: Re: Question about tcp reopen in tcp_in_window Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:12:05 +0800 Message-ID: <4EC4FA15.8000607@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4EC4AF32.5050901@cn.fujitsu.com> <4EC4CE41.2060003@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, xiaosuo@gmail.com To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:50676 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756972Ab1KQMLf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:11:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =E4=BA=8E 2011=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8817=E6=97=A5 17:41, Jozsef Kadlecsik =E5= =86=99=E9=81=93: > No, but I still don't get what's the problem with the code segment yo= u=20 > cited. You left out the comment: Thanks Jozsef Kadlecsik. Actually there is no any problem,I just want to know wath's the use of = this code segment. > We destroy the connection in the reopen case, and in that path the co= de=20 > segment above won't be called as you noticed. Maybe there is the other path? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html