From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] extensions: IPv6 NAT extensions Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:07:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4ECE2571.7090003@trash.net> References: <1322064750-26744-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> <20111124110319.GA7832@1984> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, ulrich.weber@sophos.com To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:41257 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750946Ab1KXLHb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:07:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111124110319.GA7832@1984> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/24/2011 12:03 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 05:12:24PM +0100, kaber@trash.net wrote: >> The following patches contain the IPv6 NAT extensions for my IPv6 >> NAT patchset posted on Monday. Nothing particulary interesting about >> the patches ... > Great Patrick. > > I can give you access to my tree (I didn't find time to request an > account to kernel.org again) so you can apply these patches to net-next > by yourself once they are done. Me neither. I'm going to send an update for review first though, also Rusty had some suggestions I want to look into first. What I do want to get into 3.2 though is the patch to export the nf_nat.h header. We currently have your version in the -rc, my patch renames the exported nf_nat_range to IPv4 specific names to we don't have to make up strange names for the address family independant struct. This of course needs to happen before the 3.2 release. > I expect to send updates for 3.2-rc this weekend. Then focus on > collecting patches for net-next. I'll send an updated patchset tommorrow.