From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] netfilter: IPv6 NAT Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:05:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4ED4E6A0.5010508@trash.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sclark46@earthlink.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ulrich.weber@sophos.com To: Hans Schillstrom Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:60057 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754349Ab1K2OFW (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:05:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/29/2011 01:50 PM, Hans Schillstrom wrote: >>> Probabably a dumb question but are these patches for natting ipv6 to >>> ipv6 or ipv4 to ipv6? >> IPv6 to IPv6. I haven't really considered IPv6 to IPv4 yet. > Have you ever tried ivi The IPv6 to IPv4 gateway ? > i.e address mapping and packet translation between IPv4 and IPv6 networks No, I'm currently looking at stateless IPv6 NAT mechanisms. > I made a port to resent kernel in the begining of this year ( i think it was 2.6.36 ... ) and it seems to work. > (however there is some issues left....) > > I like the idea of "ivi" for a larger scale of translation. Do you have a pointer to your port?