From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Selected corrections from Mr. Dash Four Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:11:15 +0000 Message-ID: <4EEE0293.90408@googlemail.com> References: <1324155743-25999-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> <1324155743-25999-4-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric@regit.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:41471 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751670Ab1LRPL0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:11:26 -0500 Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so9271777wgb.1 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 07:11:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1324155743-25999-4-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > -At the time of the writing there is no routing-based implementation of > +At the time of the writing, there is no routing-based implementation of > `rp_filter` in the Linux kernel for IPv6. Manual anti-spoofing via Netfilter > rules is thus needed. > I don't mean to be picky (again) but the above should be "At the time of writing, there is no routing-based implementation of `rp_filter` in the Linux kernel for IPv6 - manual anti-spoofing via Netfilter rules is needed." or "At the time of writing, there is no routing-based implementation of `rp_filter` in the Linux kernel for IPv6, therefore manual anti-spoofing via Netfilter rules is needed." > -The anti-spoofing must be done on a per-interface basis. For each interface, > +Anti-spoofing must be done on a per-interface basis. For each interface, > we must list the authorized network on the interface. There is exception, > "For each interface, we must list the authorized network on that interface."