From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ipset: change 'iface' part in hash:net,iface set Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:10:52 +0100 Message-ID: <4FFA056C.8000709@googlemail.com> References: <4FF736FE.8030109@googlemail.com> <4FF74868.3070303@googlemail.com> <4FF74D5C.6060909@googlemail.com> <4FF752F0.3010007@googlemail.com> <4FF765E7.6020809@googlemail.com> <4FF9852C.7080201@googlemail.com> <4FF9D97D.7040309@googlemail.com> <4FF9DB46.5000302@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Core Team , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Patrick McHardy To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:44669 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752370Ab2GHWLD (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2012 18:11:03 -0400 Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so2154269wgb.1 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:11:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > "src,src" != "src,dst", but > > with your patches in some cases > > "src,in" == "src,src" or "src,in" != "src,src" > Could you provide me with an example please? I am intrigued! >> Avoid what exactly? Using 'in' or 'out' in list:set types? >> > > For example. That's a possible solution. > So, in other words, what you are actually getting at, is that you wish to restrict the use of 'in' and 'out' options only for hash:net,iface types because you are not happy with the use of 'in'/'out' in any other set types, list:set in particular? Have I understood this correctly then?