Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ipset: change 'iface' part in hash:net,iface set

[Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>]

> I don't see any point in reopening a dead case.
Care to explain the above and the "reopening a dead case" bit in particular?

> I don't expect any new argument to turn up which hasn't been discussed a couple of times, 
>   
"Discussed"? What I'd suggest you do is lookup the definition of that 
word in your local dictionary and educate yourself up a bit.

A discussion on a particular subject usually takes place when there are 
(at least) two willing and participating parties. I don't remember you 
being "willing" nor "participating". What I do remember though is 
constantly evading my questions, giving me the "I am fed up" routine or 
start barking orders every time you get cornered or you are about to 
loose the argument.

You are only willing to enter into a "discussion" with someone as long 
as nobody challenges or questions your views, otherwise, as I just 
pointed out above, you start throwing your toys out of the pram and 
declare to everyone else willing to listen that "the case is closed" 
(case in point - see above!).

This isn't a discussion - it is a monologue. And I am sure you know how 
people who talk to themselves are referred to by others, right?

> You are free to submit your patches with the features I disagree with - 
> and I'll dutifully reject your patchset.
>   
I rest my case!