From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ulogd2 maintainer: Eric Leblond
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:50:30 +0000
Message-ID: <5096B8F6.2010205@googlemail.com>
References: <20121030195343.GA25885@1984> <5093E1AD.6050501@googlemail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.01.1211021610260.4894@nerf07.vanv.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Netfilter Development Mailing list
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:60003 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751993Ab2KDSug (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:50:36 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hq12so2551292wib.1
        for <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 10:50:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1211021610260.4894@nerf07.vanv.qr>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>


> Even in the light of competition of next-gen packet filter 
> implementations, I think this was really uncalled for.
>   
The subject of "competition" (or lack of it) was not what my email was 
about, but you already knew that when you posted the above, didn't you?