Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/send(2): add EPERM to the list of possible errors

[Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Michael,

Do you see any problem with these two patches?

Thanks,
Fernando


On 2013/03/19 15:45, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] man/send(2): add EPERM to the list of possible errors
>
> System policy (for example netfilter rule) can cause a send* operation
> to fail with EPERM.
>
> Reported-by: Hirotaka Sasaki <sasaki.hirotaka-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando-gVGce1chcLdL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>
> diff -urNp man-pages-3.50-orig/man2/send.2 man-pages-3.50/man2/send.2
> --- man-pages-3.50-orig/man2/send.2	2013-03-15 16:17:32.000000000 +0900
> +++ man-pages-3.50/man2/send.2	2013-03-19 15:17:03.616008275 +0900
> @@ -357,6 +357,10 @@ Some bit in the
>   .I flags
>   argument is inappropriate for the socket type.
>   .TP
> +.B EPERM
> +System policy (for example a netfilter rule) does not permit the requested
> +operation.
> +.TP
>   .B EPIPE
>   The local end has been shut down on a connection oriented socket.
>   In this case the process
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html