From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: don't reset nf_trace in nf_reset()
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:11:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51621926.10201@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365187325-25147-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net>
On 2013/04/06 02:42, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Commit 130549fe added code to reset nf_trace in nf_reset(). This is wrong
> and unnecessary.
>
> nf_reset() is used in the following cases:
>
> - when passing packets up the the socket layer, at which point we want to
> release all netfilter references that might keep modules pinned while
> the packet is queued. nf_trace doesn't matter anymore at this point.
>
> - when encapsulating or decapsulating IPsec packets. We want to continue
> tracing these packets after IPsec processing.
>
> - when passing packets through virtual network devices. Only devices on
> that encapsulate in IPv4/v6 matter since otherwise nf_trace is not
> used anymore. Its not entirely clear whether those packets should
> be traced after that, however we've always done that.
>
> - when passing packets through virtual network devices that make the
> packet cross network namespace boundaries. This is the only cases
> where we clearly want to reset nf_trace and is also what the
> original patch intended to fix.
>
> Add a new function nf_reset_trace() and use it in dev_forward_skb() to
> fix this properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Ok, I was confused by the nf_*reset*...
This patch is more proper,Since my commit will change the behavior of TRACE in some case.
Thanks for your fix and explanation.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-05 18:42 [PATCH] netfilter: don't reset nf_trace in nf_reset() Patrick McHardy
2013-04-05 18:56 ` David Miller
2013-04-05 19:14 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-05 19:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2013-04-08 1:11 ` Gao feng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51621926.10201@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).