From: Tomasz Bursztyka <tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
To: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez@gmail.com>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailing list
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC nftables kernel PATCH] netfilter: nf_tables: fix nft_meta_target module
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:32:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529745ED.5050201@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOkSjBj+XER8sn1eakaTDyDJPUn=t50WFYLE8zF4uP7Ef9TTOA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Arturo,
>> All expression have a short, one-word based name, which is nice.
> Yes, any suggestion?
Always the tricky part ^^ (complaining about is easy...).
But we might avoid that:
>> Anyway, doesn't it work already: if you create an immediate expression (to
>> load the value you want, at default dreg 0 aka NFT_REG_VERDICT) and a meta
>> expression without the NFTA_META_DREG set? (didn't try myself)
>>
> I commented the immediate load with Pablo. He suggested the value to
> be fetched from the metatarget directly.
Ok I see it optimize things, then below:
>> If not maybe there is a shorter way to fix this, instead of creating a full
>> new expression. Looks like it was the original plan.
>>
> You mean the original plan was to avoid creating a new expression?
> In that case, I will have to revisit this, as I wasn't considering
> this approach.
Thus, why not adding an attribute to the meta expression. Like:
NFTA_META_SVAL? (Of course NFTA_META_DREG and this new attribute are
mutually exclusive)
I guess then you only need to adapt struct nft_policy in
nft_meta_target.c to handle it, and adding value element in its nft_meta
struct, and there you are.
Less code and API change.
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-28 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 11:15 [RFC nftables kernel PATCH] netfilter: nf_tables: fix nft_meta_target module Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2013-11-28 12:33 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-11-28 13:15 ` Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2013-11-28 13:32 ` Tomasz Bursztyka [this message]
2013-11-28 14:33 ` Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2013-11-29 5:52 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-12-04 13:21 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-12-04 13:30 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-12-04 15:05 ` Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529745ED.5050201@linux.intel.com \
--to=tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arturo.borrero.glez@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).