netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: pablo-Cap9r6Oaw4JrovVCs/uTlw@public.gmane.org,
	netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v3] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 19:04:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52BF12CA.80406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52BE97DC.5090807-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

On 12/28/2013 10:20 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2013/12/28 16:44, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 12/28/2013 09:17 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2013 02:33 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>>>> On 2013/12/27 16:05, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>>> On 12/27/2013 04:13 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>>> I'd suggest splitting cls_cgroup code into 2 parts. The first part
>>>>>> is to manage cgroupfs and classid, and should be put into net/core/
>>>>>> and add a new config like NET_CGROUP_CLASSID for it. The second part
>>>>>> is specific cls_cgroup code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, if this is wished, I'd do this as a follow-up as it doesn't affect
>>>>> any of this code in netfilter here.
>>>>
>>>> We should clean up the code before introducing a new feature, not the
>>>> other way.
>>>
>>> Hehe, quite honestly, I think this is YOUR opinion of a "cleanup", which
>>> makes the code actually more complicated, and it's not strictly needed.
>>>
>>> If you are so desperate about this separation, fine, I will do this, but
>>> again, I don't think it's *strictly* required for this.
>>
> 
> Currently we have:
> 
> 	cls_cgroup
> 
> With your patch, it's changed to:
> 
>                                 __  cls_cgroup
>                               /
> 	net_cgroup_classid -
>                               \ __  netfilter_cgroup
> 
> The code should be re-organized.
> 
>> Thinking about this further a bit, with this separation into net/core/, you
>> would need another Kconfig, where people choose between built-in or
>> module (or none).
> 
> Just disable module support for net_cgroup_classid. I never like the cgroup
> feature that allows modular subsystems. It will be just about 100 lines of
> code, so we gain little by making it modular. Futhermore with this change,
> we can simplify include/linux/cls_cgroup.h
> 
> Moreoever cls_cgroup is the only modular cgroup subsystem, so I may even remove
> this feature from cgroup core after the change to cls_cgroup.

Ok, will send a v4 with this change included, thanks.

>> With built-in you would disallow people to load/unload the
>> cgroup part during runtime. With the module, you would introduce a module
>> dependency _for each_, even if you only want to use net_cls, which sort of
>> is not what we want from a simple "cleanup".

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-28 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1387815795.git.dborkman@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <cover.1387815795.git.dborkman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-23 17:41   ` [PATCH nf-next v3] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching Daniel Borkmann
2013-12-27  3:13     ` Li Zefan
     [not found]       ` <52BCF04B.3070908-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-27  8:05         ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]           ` <52BD34D1.1040708-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-28  1:33             ` Li Zefan
2013-12-28  8:17               ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]                 ` <52BE8936.6000001-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-28  8:44                   ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]                     ` <52BE8F50.4080005-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-28  9:20                       ` Li Zefan
     [not found]                         ` <52BE97DC.5090807-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-28  9:54                           ` Li Zefan
2013-12-28 18:04                           ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-12-28 18:37                             ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52BF12CA.80406@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pablo-Cap9r6Oaw4JrovVCs/uTlw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).