From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v3] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 19:37:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52BF1A83.7060706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52BF12CA.80406@redhat.com>
On 12/28/2013 07:04 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 12/28/2013 10:20 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>> On 2013/12/28 16:44, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2013 09:17 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>> On 12/28/2013 02:33 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>>>>> On 2013/12/27 16:05, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/27/2013 04:13 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>>>> I'd suggest splitting cls_cgroup code into 2 parts. The first part
>>>>>>> is to manage cgroupfs and classid, and should be put into net/core/
>>>>>>> and add a new config like NET_CGROUP_CLASSID for it. The second part
>>>>>>> is specific cls_cgroup code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, if this is wished, I'd do this as a follow-up as it doesn't affect
>>>>>> any of this code in netfilter here.
>>>>>
>>>>> We should clean up the code before introducing a new feature, not the
>>>>> other way.
>>>>
>>>> Hehe, quite honestly, I think this is YOUR opinion of a "cleanup", which
>>>> makes the code actually more complicated, and it's not strictly needed.
>>>>
>>>> If you are so desperate about this separation, fine, I will do this, but
>>>> again, I don't think it's *strictly* required for this.
>>>
>>
>> Currently we have:
>>
>> cls_cgroup
>>
>> With your patch, it's changed to:
>>
>> __ cls_cgroup
>> /
>> net_cgroup_classid -
>> \ __ netfilter_cgroup
>>
>> The code should be re-organized.
>>
>>> Thinking about this further a bit, with this separation into net/core/, you
>>> would need another Kconfig, where people choose between built-in or
>>> module (or none).
>>
>> Just disable module support for net_cgroup_classid. I never like the cgroup
>> feature that allows modular subsystems. It will be just about 100 lines of
>> code, so we gain little by making it modular. Futhermore with this change,
>> we can simplify include/linux/cls_cgroup.h
>>
>> Moreoever cls_cgroup is the only modular cgroup subsystem, so I may even remove
>> this feature from cgroup core after the change to cls_cgroup.
Btw, if you plan to remove modular support at some point in time, there's still
netprio_cgroup on todo.
> Ok, will send a v4 with this change included, thanks.
>
>>> With built-in you would disallow people to load/unload the
>>> cgroup part during runtime. With the module, you would introduce a module
>>> dependency _for each_, even if you only want to use net_cls, which sort of
>>> is not what we want from a simple "cleanup".
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-28 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1387815795.git.dborkman@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <cover.1387815795.git.dborkman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-23 17:41 ` [PATCH nf-next v3] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching Daniel Borkmann
2013-12-27 3:13 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <52BCF04B.3070908-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-27 8:05 ` Daniel Borkmann
[not found] ` <52BD34D1.1040708-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-28 1:33 ` Li Zefan
2013-12-28 8:17 ` Daniel Borkmann
[not found] ` <52BE8936.6000001-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-28 8:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
[not found] ` <52BE8F50.4080005-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-28 9:20 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <52BE97DC.5090807-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-28 9:54 ` Li Zefan
2013-12-28 18:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-12-28 18:37 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52BF1A83.7060706@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).