From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: Add dependency on IPV6 for NF_TABLES_INET Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:49:27 -0500 Message-ID: <52D55C87.2030401@windriver.com> References: <1389636070-26312-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <85d5725b-16f8-464a-ad88-7def74571021@email.android.com> <20140114153454.GA9425@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jozsef Kadlecsik , , , To: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Patrick McHardy Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140114153454.GA9425@localhost> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 14-01-14 10:34 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:35:42AM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> Paul Gortmaker schrieb: >>> Commit 1d49144c0aaa61be4e3ccbef9cc5c40b0ec5f2fe ("netfilter: nf_tables: >>> add "inet" table for IPv4/IPv6") allows creation of non-IPV6 enabled >>> .config files that will fail to configure/link as follows: >>> >>> warning: (NF_TABLES_INET) selects NF_TABLES_IPV6 which has unmet direct >>> dependencies (NET && INET && IPV6 && NETFILTER && NF_TABLES) >>> warning: (NF_TABLES_INET) selects NF_TABLES_IPV6 which has unmet direct >>> dependencies (NET && INET && IPV6 && NETFILTER && NF_TABLES) >>> warning: (NF_TABLES_INET) selects NF_TABLES_IPV6 which has unmet direct >>> dependencies (NET && INET && IPV6 && NETFILTER && NF_TABLES) >>> net/built-in.o: In function `nft_reject_eval': >>> nft_reject.c:(.text+0x651e8): undefined reference to `nf_ip6_checksum' >>> nft_reject.c:(.text+0x65270): undefined reference to `ip6_route_output' >>> nft_reject.c:(.text+0x656c4): undefined reference to `ip6_dst_hoplimit' >>> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 >>> >>> Since the feature is to allow for a mixed IPV4 and IPV6 table, it >>> seems sensible to make it depend on IPV6. >> >> Acked-by: Patrick McHardy > > Applied, thanks. > > @Paul: Please, use netfilter-devel ML instead next time. The netfilter > ML is reserved for user questions only. Thanks. Sure, I can do that. But it would probably be better if get_maintainer.pl didn't emit that particular address then.