From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@gmail.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v2] netfilter: don't use module_init/exit in core IPV4 code
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:38:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D83522.9070902@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140116192613.GA23133@d2.synalogic.ca>
On 14-01-16 02:26 PM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> On 2014/01/15 15:57, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> The file net/ipv4/netfilter.o is created based on whether
>> CONFIG_NETFILTER is set. However that is defined as a bool, and
>> hence this file with the core netfilter hooks will never be
>> modular. So using module_init as an alias for __initcall can be
>> somewhat misleading.
>>
>> Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
>> init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd
>> have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
>> would be a worse thing. Also add an inclusion of init.h, as
>> that was previously implicit here in the netfilter.c file.
>>
>> Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
>> of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets
>> mapped onto device_initcall, our use of subsys_initcall (which
>> seems to make sense for netfilter code) will thus change this
>> registration from level 6-device to level 4-subsys (i.e. slightly
>> earlier). However no observable impact of that small difference
>> has been observed during testing, or is expected. (i.e. the
>> location of the netfilter messages in dmesg remains unchanged
>> with respect to all the other surrounding messages.)
>>
>> As for the module_exit, rather than replace it with __exitcall,
>> we simply remove it, since it appears only UML does anything
>> with those, and even for UML, there is no relevant cleanup
>> to be done here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>
>> [v2: Drop __exitcall stuff completely, as per Eric's suggestion
>> given for patch at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/311164/ ]
>>
>> net/ipv4/netfilter.c | 9 +--------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter.c
>> index c3e0adea9c27..31abf9636ba7 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter.c
>> @@ -197,11 +197,4 @@ static int __init ipv4_netfilter_init(void)
>> {
>> return nf_register_afinfo(&nf_ip_afinfo);
>> }
>> -
>> -static void __exit ipv4_netfilter_fini(void)
>> -{
>> - nf_unregister_afinfo(&nf_ip_afinfo);
>> -}
>> -
>> -module_init(ipv4_netfilter_init);
>> -module_exit(ipv4_netfilter_fini);
>> +device_initcall(ipv4_netfilter_init);
>
> device_ vs. subsys_initcall changed from v1 of the patch and no longer
> matches the description I think.
Thanks for spotting that ; not sure how I fat fingered that
during the exitcall removal. Trying to rush things I guess.
P.
--
>
>> --
>> 1.8.5.2
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-16 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1389638147-30399-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2014-01-15 20:57 ` [PATCH-next v2] netfilter: don't use module_init/exit in core IPV4 code Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-16 19:26 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-01-16 19:38 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2014-01-16 20:24 ` [PATCH-next v3] " Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-16 20:32 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D83522.9070902@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=benjamin.poirier@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).