From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Bursztyka Subject: Re: [iptables (nft-compat) PATCH 3/8] xtables: Handle family is not related to Netlink family Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:13:17 +0200 Message-ID: <52FA05CD.2060008@linux.intel.com> References: <1392115608-6733-1-git-send-email-tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com> <1392115608-6733-4-git-send-email-tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com> <20140211110242.GB4299@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:13394 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750807AbaBKLNU (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:13:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140211110242.GB4299@localhost> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> AF_INET vs NFPROTO_IPV4 >> AF_INET6 vs NFPROTO_IPV6 > I think we should stick to NFPROTO_* > > I can see many references to AF_ in the compat layer, you can send me > a patch to rename all those instead. Actually we have always used AF_* I will do the change Tomasz