netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Jones <rob.jones@codethink.co.uk>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@codethink.co.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/netfilter/x_tables.c: use __seq_open_private()
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:14:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54227D7D.6020909@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140923214021.GA4206@salvia>



On 23/09/14 22:40, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:46:27PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 18:05 +0100, Rob Jones wrote:
>>> Reduce boilerplate code by using __seq_open_private() instead of seq_open()
>>> in xt_match_open() and xt_target_open().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Jones <rob.jones@codethink.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This patch uses an existing variant of seq_open() to reduce the kernel code
>>> size.
>>>
>>> The only significant variation from the pre-existing code is the fact that
>>> __seq_open_private() calls kzalloc() rather than kmalloc(), which could
>>> conceivably have an impact on timing.
>>>
>>> This version 2 incorporates a minor initialisation simplification (resulting
>>> from kzalloc() being used) requested by netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
>> [...]
>>> --- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
>>> +++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
>>> @@ -1080,7 +1080,6 @@ static void *xt_mttg_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos,
>>>          struct nf_mttg_trav *trav = seq->private;
>>>          unsigned int j;
>>>
>>> -       trav->class = MTTG_TRAV_INIT;
>>>          for (j = 0; j < *pos; ++j)
>>>                  if (xt_mttg_seq_next(seq, NULL, NULL, is_target) == NULL)
>>>                          return NULL;
>> [...]
>>
>> I'm fairly sure this simplification is wrong, as xt_mttg_seq_start() is
>> potentially called multiple times on the same file handle.

Well spotted Ben.

>
> Right. I'm going to take v1 of this patch instead, sorry for the
> inconvenience Rob.

No problem at all. It gave me something to do on the train home last
night :-)

-- 
Rob Jones
Codethink Ltd
mailto:rob.jones@codethink.co.uk
tel:+44 161 236 5575

      reply	other threads:[~2014-09-24  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-23 17:05 [PATCH v2] net/netfilter/x_tables.c: use __seq_open_private() Rob Jones
2014-09-23 17:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-09-23 21:40   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-09-24  8:14     ` Rob Jones [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54227D7D.6020909@codethink.co.uk \
    --to=rob.jones@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).