From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
To: vDev <vijaypas@gmail.com>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NAT dropping FIN ACK from remote server
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:18:33 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54457C29.7040802@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC=w+U4bYSJ8d=0GmgmM3miVrd54sN1y0_ppsvs97gd7gLo+2g@mail.gmail.com>
On 16-10-2014 18:57, vDev wrote:
> I am experiencing a problem with Linux as a NAT router. A host/client
> on the private LAN establishes a TCP connection to a server on the WAN
> (Internet) through the Linux/NAT router. Here's what happens when
> client attempts to tear down the socket.
>
> 1. Client on private LAN opens a TCP connection to the remote server
> on the public network through Linux/NAT router.
> 2. Client exchanges data with the remote server.
> 3. The server closes the TCP connection by sending a FIN to the
> client. Linux/NAT router successfully forwards the FIN to the client.
> 4. The client now sends an ACK to FIN to the remote host, which is
> forwarded by the Linux/NAT router to the server.
> 5. The client then sends a FIN to the remote host, which is forwarded
> by the Linux/NAT router to the remote server.
> 6. The server now sends an ACK to the client. THE Linux/NAT router
> DOES NOT FORWARD THE ACK TO THE CLIENT. GETS DROPPED!
> 7. The client keeps sending FIN to the remote host for a period of time.
> 8. The client times out and send a RST to the remote host.
>
> I am trying to find out why Linux/NAT router dropped the ACK. This
> seems like a problem where connection tracking is prematurely tearing
> down the mapping and does not forward the ACK back to the client.
>
> Is there a way to resolve this?
>
> Also, any debugging techniques will be helpful.
Try checking if this ignored ack is being marked as invalid by conntrack with
something like iptables -I FORWARD -m conntrack --ctstate INVALID -j LOG
If it's marked as INVALID, for whatever reason, we won't NAT it.. (and you
probably have another rule that ends up dropping the not-NATed packet, if
that's the case)
Marcelo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-20 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-16 21:57 NAT dropping FIN ACK from remote server vDev
2014-10-20 21:18 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2014-10-20 21:35 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54457C29.7040802@redhat.com \
--to=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vijaypas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).