From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [PATCH next 0/30] Passing net through the netfilter hooks Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:08:50 +0200 Message-ID: <55FBB882.8090403@6wind.com> References: <87mvwn18my.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <55FAEAAC.1070302@6wind.com> <876138wuoq.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , David Miller , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:36496 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752593AbbIRHIy (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 03:08:54 -0400 Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so19410650wic.1 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:08:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <876138wuoq.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 18/09/2015 00:24, Eric W. Biederman a =C3=A9crit : [snip] > Thanks for review. I have added an extra patch for the missing blank > lines that are still missing after the entire series. As they affect > neither code correctness nor bisectability I don't think there is any > point respinning the indivdual patches. It's fine for me, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html