From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerhard Wiesinger Subject: Re: Linux 4.2.4 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:11:11 +0100 Message-ID: <562DEE2F.6030809@wiesinger.com> References: <20151023003306.GA25388@kroah.com> <562C83FD.6010402@wiesinger.com> <20151025082547.GA22300@kroah.com> <20151025090308.GA17656@1wt.eu> <562CA13C.90500@wiesinger.com> <20151025094634.GA6832@1wt.eu> <562CB396.2080509@wiesinger.com> <562D36D9.9060504@wiesinger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Willy Tarreau , Linux Kernel Network Developers , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, lwn@lwn.net, Jiri Slaby To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 26.10.2015 09:58, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: > >> Also any idea regarding the second isssue? Or do you think it has the >> same root cause? > Looking at your RedHat bugzilla report, the "nf_conntrack: table full, > dropping packet" and "Alignment trap: not handling instruction" are two > unrelated issues and the second one is triggered by the unaligned counter > extension acccess in ipset, I'm investigating. I can't think of any reason > how those issues could be related to each other. Yes, they are unrelated. Issue 1: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet => Fixed with 4.2.4 Issue 2: Alignment trap: not handling instruction => Happens when ipset counters are enabled Please keep in mind it happens with IPv6 commands. Currently 4.2.4 without ipset counters runs well. Ciao, Gerhard