From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Luuk Paulussen <Luuk.Paulussen@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add tcindex to conntrack and add netfilter target/matches
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 10:07:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5667EF49.8060707@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5664ECCC.1030104@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
On 12/07/2015 03:19 AM, Luuk Paulussen wrote:
> On 12/07/2015 11:45 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> Luuk Paulussen <Luuk.Paulussen@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm still hoping for some feedback on this. I have some userspace
>>> patches around this as well, (to set/show the tc_index in the
>>> connection, and to add the marking/matching rules in iptables), but I am
>>> holding off on sending them until I know what people think of this
>>> idea/implementation first.
>> I can't say for sure since I don't know enough about tc.
>>
>> However, AFAICS tc_index seems to be something that should be internal
>> to tc and not exposed/changeable via iptables.
> tc_index is a mark that can be set by certain configurable ingress
> schedulers (dsmark, GRED, ingress) for later classification via the
> tcindex classifer. This just adds an alternative mechanism for setting
> this mark if those schedulers aren't being used.
Fwiw, tc_index can be read/written by cls_bpf (and you can also apply masks
on that field if needed).
> * dsmark sets the tc_index value based on the incoming DSCP value
> * ingress sets the tc_index value based on other rules (e.g. mark set
> via iptables)
> * New code sets tc_index directly based on iptables classification or
> restoring saved value.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-09 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 21:59 Support marking/matching tc_index in netfilter Luuk Paulussen
2015-12-03 21:59 ` [PATCH] Add tcindex to conntrack and add netfilter target/matches Luuk Paulussen
2015-12-06 22:28 ` Luuk Paulussen
2015-12-06 22:45 ` Florian Westphal
2015-12-07 2:19 ` Luuk Paulussen
2015-12-07 3:05 ` Florian Westphal
2015-12-07 4:24 ` Luuk Paulussen
2015-12-09 9:07 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-12-13 23:00 ` Luuk Paulussen
2015-12-14 9:50 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5667EF49.8060707@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=Luuk.Paulussen@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).