From: wzt wzt <wzt.wzt@gmail.com>
To: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Netfilter: Fix integer overflow in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:11:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <628d1651003222011v2389fc68u7ba009ae4b781884@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b6bb4a51003222005v5fd71c8ao7fd1d05fb1ef2d8b@mail.gmail.com>
> get.size is unsigned int, UINT_MAX is 0x FFFFFFFF, not 0x7FFFFFFF
> And you're metioning "addition", then why you're checking as "multiplication"?
oh, my falut:( the patch is multiplication check, not addition check.
thanks for helping me:)
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:37 AM, wzt wzt <wzt.wzt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Patrick's point is that you're using "if (get.size >= INT_MAX /
>>> sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries))"
>>> So, did you find any chance that get.size * sizeof(struct
>>> ipt_get_entries) >= INT_MAX ?
>>>
>> would you carefully read my explain???
>> get.size is copy from the user space, it can be set as 0x7fffffff,
>> addition with sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) can be overflow.
>>
>
> get.size is unsigned int, UINT_MAX is 0x FFFFFFFF, not 0x7FFFFFFF
> And you're metioning "addition", then why you're checking as "multiplication"?
>
>>> And, for the addition overflow, can it be caught by
>>>
>>> "if (*len != sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size)" ???
>>>
>> sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size can be overflow as *len,
>> get.size is control by user space with copy_from_user().
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:34 AM, wzt wzt <wzt.wzt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I can see that the size might cause an overflow in the addition with
>>>>> sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries)
>>>> That's the integer overflow i pointed.
>>>> get.size is copy from the user space, it can be set as 0x7fffffff,
>>>> addition with sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) can be overflow.
>>>
>>> Patrick's point is that you're using "if (get.size >= INT_MAX /
>>> sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries))"
>>> So, did you find any chance that get.size * sizeof(struct
>>> ipt_get_entries) >= INT_MAX ?
>>>
>>> And, for the addition overflow, can it be caught by
>>>
>>> "if (*len != sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size)" ???
>>>
>>>>
>>>> if (*len != sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size) {
>>>> duprintf("get_entries: %u != %zu\n",
>>>> *len, sizeof(get) + get.size);
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> so, check get.size max value before addition with sizeof(struct
>>>> ipt_get_entries) to prevent the integer overflow.
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-23 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-20 14:32 [PATCH] Netfilter: Fix integer overflow in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c wzt.wzt
2010-03-22 17:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-23 1:34 ` wzt wzt
2010-03-23 2:29 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-03-23 2:37 ` wzt wzt
2010-03-23 3:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-23 3:48 ` wzt wzt
2010-03-23 4:49 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-03-23 5:49 ` wzt wzt
2010-03-23 3:05 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-03-23 3:11 ` wzt wzt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=628d1651003222011v2389fc68u7ba009ae4b781884@mail.gmail.com \
--to=wzt.wzt@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xtfeng@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).