From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "JC Janos" <jcjanos245@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Xtables-addons 1.6
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:20:31 -0800
Message-ID: <7259d7020811181620n1ca06f84oe9d6d1f5f0a680c7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0811181840170.2316@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Netfilter Developer Mailing List" <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netfilter@vger.kernel.org
To: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@medozas.de>
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0811181840170.2316@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Jan,

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> wrote:
> which incorporates a newer version of ipset (after the many releases it
> did ;-)

If we already have built & installed the latest ipset from its svn:
repository is it ok to use it instead?

Can the xtables-addons build be informed of a preexisting ipset?
'configure --help' doesn't seem to have an option for it.

Thanks.

--JC