From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>,
pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5 nf-next v3] bridge: add br_vlan_get_info_rcu()
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 21:27:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b25d1ff-c527-5b79-d5de-6db13fdd8157@ucloud.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <114db8d1-2267-a338-688a-61f7f6db53ac@cumulusnetworks.com>
在 2019/7/6 20:11, Nikolay Aleksandrov 写道:
> On 06/07/2019 01:09, wenxu@ucloud.cn wrote:
>> From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>>
>> This new function allows you to fetch vlan info from packet path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>> ---
>> include/linux/if_bridge.h | 7 +++++++
>> net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
> Hi,
> This patch will need more work, comments below.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
>> index 9e57c44..5c85608 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/if_bridge.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
>> @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ static inline bool br_multicast_router(const struct net_device *dev)
>> int br_vlan_get_proto(const struct net_device *dev, u16 *p_proto);
>> int br_vlan_get_info(const struct net_device *dev, u16 vid,
>> struct bridge_vlan_info *p_vinfo);
>> +int br_vlan_get_info_rcu(const struct net_device *dev, u16 vid,
>> + struct bridge_vlan_info *p_vinfo);
>> #else
>> static inline bool br_vlan_enabled(const struct net_device *dev)
>> {
>> @@ -118,6 +120,11 @@ static inline int br_vlan_get_info(const struct net_device *dev, u16 vid,
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> +static inline int br_vlan_get_info_rcu(const struct net_device *dev, u16 vid,
>> + struct bridge_vlan_info *p_vinfo)
>> +{
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> #endif
>>
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE)
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
>> index 021cc9f66..2799a88 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
>> @@ -1267,15 +1267,13 @@ int br_vlan_get_pvid_rcu(const struct net_device *dev, u16 *p_pvid)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(br_vlan_get_pvid_rcu);
>>
>> -int br_vlan_get_info(const struct net_device *dev, u16 vid,
>> - struct bridge_vlan_info *p_vinfo)
>> +static int __br_vlan_get_info(const struct net_device *dev, u16 vid,
>> + struct net_bridge_port *p,
>> + struct bridge_vlan_info *p_vinfo)
>> {
>> struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
>> struct net_bridge_vlan *v;
>> - struct net_bridge_port *p;
>>
>> - ASSERT_RTNL();
> Removing the assert here doesn't make the function proper for RCU usage.
> Also note that for the RCU version you need to check if vg
> is null.
Why need check if vg is null? The br_vlan_find already check it.
>
>> - p = br_port_get_check_rtnl(dev);
>> if (p)
>> vg = nbp_vlan_group(p);
>> else if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev))
>> @@ -1291,8 +1289,23 @@ int br_vlan_get_info(const struct net_device *dev, u16 vid,
>> p_vinfo->flags = v->flags;
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +int br_vlan_get_info(const struct net_device *dev, u16 vid,
>> + struct bridge_vlan_info *p_vinfo)
>> +{
>> + ASSERT_RTNL();
>> +
>> + return __br_vlan_get_info(dev, vid, br_port_get_check_rtnl(dev), p_vinfo);
>> +}
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(br_vlan_get_info);
>>
>> +int br_vlan_get_info_rcu(const struct net_device *dev, u16 vid,
>> + struct bridge_vlan_info *p_vinfo)
>> +{
>> + return __br_vlan_get_info(dev, vid, br_port_get_check_rtnl(dev), p_vinfo);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(br_vlan_get_info_rcu);
>> +
> This should use br_port_get_check_rcu().
>
>> static int br_vlan_is_bind_vlan_dev(const struct net_device *dev)
>> {
>> return is_vlan_dev(dev) &&
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-06 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-05 22:09 [PATCH 1/5 nf-next v3] netfilter:nf_flow_table: Refactor flow_offload_tuple to destination wenxu
2019-07-05 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/5 nf-next v3] netfilter:nf_flow_table: Separate inet operation to single function wenxu
2019-07-05 22:09 ` [PATCH 3/5 nf-next v3] bridge: add br_vlan_get_info_rcu() wenxu
2019-07-06 12:11 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-07-06 13:27 ` wenxu [this message]
2019-07-06 13:35 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-07-05 22:09 ` [PATCH 4/5 nf-next v3] netfilter:nf_flow_table: Support bridge family flow offload wenxu
2019-07-05 22:09 ` [PATCH 5/5 nf-next v3] netfilter: Flow table support the bridge family for ipv4 wenxu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b25d1ff-c527-5b79-d5de-6db13fdd8157@ucloud.cn \
--to=wenxu@ucloud.cn \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).