netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<pablo@netfilter.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>, <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, <jiri@resnulli.us>, <ozsh@nvidia.com>,
	<simon.horman@corigine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] Allow offloading of UDP NEW connections via act_ct
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:38:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k01hbtbs.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8m4A7GchYdx21/h@t14s.localdomain>


On Thu 19 Jan 2023 at 18:37, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 08:50:57PM +0100, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> Currently only bidirectional established connections can be offloaded
>> via act_ct. Such approach allows to hardcode a lot of assumptions into
>> act_ct, flow_table and flow_offload intermediate layer codes. In order
>> to enabled offloading of unidirectional UDP NEW connections start with
>> incrementally changing the following assumptions:
>> 
>> - Drivers assume that only established connections are offloaded and
>>   don't support updating existing connections. Extract ctinfo from meta
>>   action cookie and refuse offloading of new connections in the drivers.
>
> Hi Vlad,
>
> Regarding ct_seq_show(). When dumping the CT entries today, it will do
> things like:
>
>         if (!test_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT, &ct->status))
>                 seq_printf(s, "%ld ", nf_ct_expires(ct)  / HZ);
>
> omit the timeout, which is okay with this new patchset, but then:
>
>         if (test_bit(IPS_HW_OFFLOAD_BIT, &ct->status))
>                 seq_puts(s, "[HW_OFFLOAD] ");
>         else if (test_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT, &ct->status))
>                 seq_puts(s, "[OFFLOAD] ");
>         else if (test_bit(IPS_ASSURED_BIT, &ct->status))
>                 seq_puts(s, "[ASSURED] ");
>
> Previously, in order to be offloaded, it had to be Assured. But not
> anymore after this patchset. Thoughts?

Hi Marcelo,

I know that for some reason offloaded entries no longer display
'assured' flag in the dump. This could be changed, but I don't have a
preference either way and this patch set doesn't modify the behavior.
Up to you and maintainers I guess.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-20  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-19 19:50 [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] Allow offloading of UDP NEW connections via act_ct Vlad Buslov
2023-01-19 19:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] net: flow_offload: provision conntrack info in ct_metadata Vlad Buslov
2023-01-19 19:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] netfilter: flowtable: fixup UDP timeout depending on ct state Vlad Buslov
2023-01-20 11:57   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-01-24  7:08     ` Vlad Buslov
2023-01-19 19:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] netfilter: flowtable: allow unidirectional rules Vlad Buslov
2023-01-19 19:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/7] netfilter: flowtable: allow updating offloaded rules asynchronously Vlad Buslov
2023-01-20 11:41   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-01-24  7:06     ` Vlad Buslov
2023-01-24  8:41       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-01-24  9:19         ` Vlad Buslov
2023-01-24 13:57           ` Vlad Buslov
2023-01-19 19:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/7] net/sched: act_ct: set ctinfo in meta action depending on ct state Vlad Buslov
2023-01-19 19:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/7] net/sched: act_ct: offload UDP NEW connections Vlad Buslov
2023-01-19 19:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/7] netfilter: nf_conntrack: allow early drop of offloaded UDP conns Vlad Buslov
2023-01-19 21:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] Allow offloading of UDP NEW connections via act_ct Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2023-01-20  6:38   ` Vlad Buslov [this message]
2023-01-20  6:57     ` Vlad Buslov
2023-01-20 11:30       ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k01hbtbs.fsf@nvidia.com \
    --to=vladbu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ozsh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).