netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>, <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
	<fw@strlen.de>, Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: flowtable: additional checks for outdated flows
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 22:45:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pm13pzny.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTgdvbb3Z8RrFWzJ@calendula>

On Tue 24 Oct 2023 at 21:40, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> Hi Vlad,
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:17:18PM +0200, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> Current nf_flow_is_outdated() implementation considers any flow table flow
>> which state diverged from its underlying CT connection status for teardown
>> which can be problematic in the following cases:
>> 
>> - Flow has never been offloaded to hardware in the first place either
>> because flow table has hardware offload disabled (flag
>> NF_FLOWTABLE_HW_OFFLOAD is not set) or because it is still pending on 'add'
>> workqueue to be offloaded for the first time. The former is incorrect, the
>> later generates excessive deletions and additions of flows.
>> 
>> - Flow is already pending to be updated on the workqueue. Tearing down such
>> flows will also generate excessive removals from the flow table, especially
>> on highly loaded system where the latency to re-offload a flow via 'add'
>> workqueue can be quite high.
>> 
>> When considering a flow for teardown as outdated verify that it is both
>> offloaded to hardware and doesn't have any pending updates.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I have posted an alternative patch to move the handling of
> NF_FLOW_HW_ESTABLISHED, which is specific for sched/act_ct:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20231024193815.1987-1-pablo@netfilter.org/
>
> it is a bit more code, but it makes it easier to understand for the
> code reader that this bit is net/sched specific.
>

Thanks for refactoring this, I agree that separating the act_ct-specific
check makes it more obvious.

How would you prefer to solve the conflict with my fix? Should I wait
for your patch to be accepted to net, rebase my fix on top and submit
V2? Or you can incorporate the checks from my fix together with my
signoff and submit it as a single change?

>> Fixes: 41f2c7c342d3 ("net/sched: act_ct: Fix promotion of offloaded unreplied tuple")
>> Reviewed-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
>> index 1d34d700bd09..db404f89d3d7 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
>> @@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flow_offload_refresh);
>>  static bool nf_flow_is_outdated(const struct flow_offload *flow)
>>  {
>>  	return test_bit(IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT, &flow->ct->status) &&
>> +		test_bit(IPS_HW_OFFLOAD_BIT, &flow->ct->status) &&
>> +		!test_bit(NF_FLOW_HW_PENDING, &flow->flags) &&
>>  		!test_bit(NF_FLOW_HW_ESTABLISHED, &flow->flags);
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.39.2
>> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-24 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-24 17:17 [PATCH net] netfilter: flowtable: additional checks for outdated flows Vlad Buslov
2023-10-24 19:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-24 19:45   ` Vlad Buslov [this message]
2023-10-24 20:07     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-24 20:16       ` Vlad Buslov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pm13pzny.fsf@nvidia.com \
    --to=vladbu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).