From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out.kfki.hu (smtp-out.kfki.hu [148.6.0.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6BA32940D for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 16:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.6.0.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736614275; cv=none; b=loMIyfHdO1BETx1Dee24V1rjLhBQ9ywZa0G4RJkcTyJL5u6jCKCCvxs+mSyf0vJ8EZTuRic1uoCq2USzNdcE03F7nLl6SF7SnZ+nI75gc4Ty8RQsFAruABwSD+TsPiW3bNGV3LhNWFlkDoR9BUEdT3gsofF63KHn0L2S01fqUNo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736614275; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iOWVZPGVNpbA9djXXWWK+QW/haB8m0S5npv4do4ponk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TFUX5karBLqrWWCrpW3W7qXQNWKSykonpeI7YoSpzf8Hsf5L1uOZTX1HQuw69fqAg2pJTY4lyTHrZkJ7jUg8PpMGROlsrKFkKsyT+y/qncWouUnLqD4un10rNRr+82A9pvnK9hpboTDM9NfhzMHXRsaPbb+nCNLl/ZAg57IQsVg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.6.0.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.kfki.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112EE32E01AE; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 17:51:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at smtp2.kfki.hu Received: from smtp2.kfki.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.kfki.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id SFyKq-_9b4KV; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 17:51:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mentat.rmki.kfki.hu (80-95-82-5.pool.digikabel.hu [80.95.82.5]) (Authenticated sender: kadlecsik.jozsef@wigner.hu) by smtp2.kfki.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E89932E01AD; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 17:51:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by mentat.rmki.kfki.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0AC8C142836; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 17:51:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mentat.rmki.kfki.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D8B1424A2; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 17:51:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 17:51:02 +0100 (CET) From: Jozsef Kadlecsik To: Florian Westphal cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=C5=BBenczykowski?= , Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: Android boot failure with 6.12 In-Reply-To: <20250111140543.GB14912@breakpoint.cc> Message-ID: <94f5258d-c40a-4bcf-0e1e-f791d5fdb9cf@netfilter.org> References: <16d951e0-5fce-c227-5f50-10ecf3f16967@netfilter.org> <20250111140543.GB14912@breakpoint.cc> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-deepspam: ham 0% Hi Florian, On Sat, 11 Jan 2025, Florian Westphal wrote: > > Also, why the "mark" match was not split into NFPROTO_IPV4, > > NFPROTO_ARP, NFPROTO_IPV6 explicitly (and other matches where the > > target was split)? > > mark match is fine, afaics. Whats the concern? > > The target got split because ebtables EBT_CONTINUE isn't equal to > XT_CONTINUE, so it won't do the right thing. I have just reread the description of your patch "netfilter: xtables: avoid NFPROTO_UNSPEC where needed" and now I see why the match is fine as is. Thanks! Best regards, Jozsef -- E-mail : kadlec@netfilter.org, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlecsik.jozsef@wigner.hu Address: Wigner Research Centre for Physics H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary