netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Missing kernel header files
@ 2010-09-30 20:51 David Corrales
  2010-10-01 21:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Corrales @ 2010-09-30 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter-devel

Hi everyone,

Recently I ran across some issues when compiling iptables 1.2.9
against kernel 2.6.24. It seems that between kernel versions 2.6.31 to
2.6.32, lots of headers were removed from linux/include/netfilter and
linux/include/netfilter_ipv4. Some of them are ipt_connmark.h,
ipt_conntrack.h, ipt_MARK.h and so on.

I recon that the iptables version is rather old but I was wondering if
it possible to patch it in order to compile with the upgrades. I just
can't seem to find any good info on these changes, what was merged or
what's now deprecated. There's no "migrating" guide anywhere and
google isn't helping as much as I would like it to.

Thanks in advance,
-David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Missing kernel header files
  2010-09-30 20:51 Missing kernel header files David Corrales
@ 2010-10-01 21:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
  2010-10-04 16:56   ` David Corrales
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-10-01 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Corrales; +Cc: netfilter-devel

On Thursday 2010-09-30 22:51, David Corrales wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>Recently I ran across some issues when compiling iptables 1.2.9
>against kernel 2.6.24.

Choosing arbitrary kernels is not designed to work before 1.4.3.

>I recon that the iptables version is rather old but I was wondering if
>it possible to patch it in order to compile with the upgrades.

Why bother with patching when just using 1.4.9 yields equivalent 
behavior?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Missing kernel header files
  2010-10-01 21:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2010-10-04 16:56   ` David Corrales
  2010-10-16 15:34     ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Corrales @ 2010-10-04 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Engelhardt; +Cc: netfilter-devel

> Choosing arbitrary kernels is not designed to work before 1.4.3.

Oh, that's too bad :(

> Why bother with patching when just using 1.4.9 yields equivalent
> behavior?
>

Thing is that other software modules depend on this headers as well so
I wanted to minimize the impact. I rather patch than bump the version
number.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Missing kernel header files
  2010-10-04 16:56   ` David Corrales
@ 2010-10-16 15:34     ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-10-16 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Corrales; +Cc: netfilter-devel

On Monday 2010-10-04 18:56, David Corrales wrote:

>> Choosing arbitrary kernels is not designed to work before 1.4.3.
>
>Oh, that's too bad :(
>
>> Why bother with patching when just using 1.4.9 yields equivalent
>> behavior?
>>
>
>Thing is that other software modules depend on this headers as well so
>I wanted to minimize the impact. I rather patch than bump the version
>number.

The risk of incomplete patching is higher than using a newer release.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-16 15:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-30 20:51 Missing kernel header files David Corrales
2010-10-01 21:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-04 16:56   ` David Corrales
2010-10-16 15:34     ` Jan Engelhardt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).