From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the original direction for latter use
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:32:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=oP989w2pO8j5fdzOYhWCeSNEQuZLHefAgGa_Y@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282035715.2448.24.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mardi 17 août 2010 à 16:46 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Three variables ?
>> >
>> > static atomic_t rnd __read_mostly;
>> >
>> > if (unlikely(!atomic_read(&rnd))) {
>> > unsigned int val;
>> >
>> > get_random_bytes(&val, sizeof(val));
>> > if (!val)
>> > val = 1;
>> > atomic_cmpxchg(&rnd, 0, val);
>> > }
>> >
>>
>>
>> Good idea. However, atomic_t is a volatile variable, and it prevent
>> ILP. I think maybe it hurts the likely case. cmpxchg() is an atomic
>> operations, so is the bellow code better?
>>
>
> I am not sure what you mean by ILP.
I mean http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instruction_level_parallelism
and volatile will suppress compiler optimization.
>
> On x86, reading twice same memory location is faster than
> reading it and store in temp variable (on stack)
> reading from stack
Thanks for this info. But compiler may store it in a register. In
fact, we can't control the behavior of compiler in C.
>
>> static unsigned long rnd __read_mostly;
>>
>> if (unlikely(!rnd)) {
>> unsigned long val;
>>
>> get_random_bytes(&val, sizeof(val));
>> if (!val)
>> val = 1;
>> cmpxchg(&rnd, 0, val);
>> }
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> I am not sure we must use a long (we really need 4 bytes only),
Yea, 4 bytes is enough.
> and last
> time I tried to use cmpxchg(), I was being told it was not available on
> all arches.
>
> But seeing it used in kernel/pid.c, maybe its not true anymore (that is,
> __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG is always defined to 1)
>
> Since its a recent change (in kernel/pid.c), I would wait a bit and see
> if an arch maintainer complains ;)
>
Thanks. I saw it. These are two cmpxchg() in file:
include/asm-generic/cmpxchg.h
include/asm-generic/system.h
static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(volatile unsigned long *m,
unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
{
unsigned long retval;
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
retval = *m;
if (retval == old)
*m = new;
local_irq_restore(flags);
return retval;
}
#define cmpxchg(ptr, o, n) \
((__typeof__(*(ptr))) __cmpxchg((unsigned long *)(ptr), \
(unsigned long)(o), \
(unsigned long)(n)))
This one seems buggy when using it to non unsigned long variables. And
in kernel/pid.c, the last_pid variable is int.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-17 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 7:16 [PATCH] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the original direction for latter use Changli Gao
2010-08-17 8:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-17 8:46 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-17 9:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-17 9:32 ` Changli Gao [this message]
2010-08-19 3:59 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-19 12:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-08-19 15:31 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=oP989w2pO8j5fdzOYhWCeSNEQuZLHefAgGa_Y@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).