From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: ebtables: make broute table work again
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:47:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikgoc6xzx-0xn4cXsVuWVETOG1=dpE_1kZKBVnM@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293150436-12092-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> broute table init hook sets up the "br_should_route_hook" pointer,
> which then gets called from br_input.
>
> commit a386f99025f13b32502fe5dedf223c20d7283826
> (bridge: add proper RCU annotation to should_route_hook)
> introduced a typedef, and then changed this to:
>
> br_should_route_hook_t *rhook;
> [..]
> rhook = rcu_dereference(br_should_route_hook);
> if (*rhook(skb))
>
> problem is that "br_should_route_hook" contains the address of the function,
> so calling *rhook() results in kernel panic.
>
> Can't simply use "if (rhook(skb)", because br_should_route_hook_t *rhook
> is not a function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> ---
>
> include/linux/if_bridge.h | 2 +-
> net/bridge/br_input.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
> index f7e73c3..dd3f201 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct __fdb_entry {
>
> extern void brioctl_set(int (*ioctl_hook)(struct net *, unsigned int, void __user *));
>
> -typedef int (*br_should_route_hook_t)(struct sk_buff *skb);
> +typedef int br_should_route_hook_t(struct sk_buff *skb);
> extern br_should_route_hook_t __rcu *br_should_route_hook;
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> index 6f6d8e1..1d677bf 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ forward:
> case BR_STATE_FORWARDING:
> rhook = rcu_dereference(br_should_route_hook);
> if (rhook) {
> - if ((*rhook)(skb))
> + if (rhook(skb))
I don't think this change is necessary. Would you like to remove this
change and test again?
> return skb;
> dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;
> }
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-24 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-24 0:27 [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: ebtables: make broute table work again Florian Westphal
2010-12-24 0:47 ` Changli Gao [this message]
2010-12-24 0:55 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTikgoc6xzx-0xn4cXsVuWVETOG1=dpE_1kZKBVnM@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).