netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej Żenczykowski" <zenczykowski@gmail.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue due to constant "modprobes"
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:10:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik3=XWQHH9au7434RTJuf_Rg2sYSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1104100022500.27387@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>

I should probably point out that iptables module autoloading behaviour
is very different for a pre-my commit statically compiled, non-shared
iptables binary
vs a post-my commit or non-statically compiled binary.

The modprobe issue would only show up if you had a statically
compiled, non-shared iptables binary.
ie. one where all the extensions were already part of the iptables
binary and would always get initialized at startup (even for iptables
-h).

Basically the problem is when we're doing revision compatibility
testing as part of an extensions init sequence we will modprobe from
userspace.
I believe we always attempt a module load there instead of first
checking for api existence, and modprobing if the API is missing.

The fix would probably be in xtables.c in compatible_revision() to
change everything starting with:
  xtables_load_ko(xtables_modprobe_program, true);
into a for loop:

something along the lines of

for (int load = 0; load <= 1; ++load) {
  if (load) xtables_load_ko(...);

  ...

  and replace "close(sockfd); return 0;" with "if (load) {
close(sockfd); return 0; }; continue;"

I'll try to write up and maybe even test a real patch tomorrow.

- Maciej

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-13  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-07 23:16 Performance issue due to constant "modprobes" Ed W
2011-04-08  0:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-08 17:11   ` Ed W
2011-04-08  0:47 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-08 17:11   ` Ed W
2011-04-08 19:54     ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-08 23:22       ` Ed W
2011-04-08 23:42         ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-09 20:39           ` Ed W
2011-04-09 22:30             ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-12 21:03               ` Ed W
2011-04-12 22:05                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 11:08                   ` Ed W
2011-04-13 12:06                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13  9:10               ` Maciej Żenczykowski [this message]
2011-04-13 11:35                 ` Ed W
2011-04-13 12:13                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 12:35                     ` Ed W
2011-04-13 12:45                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 16:45                         ` Ed W
2011-04-13 19:20                           ` Mr Dash Four
2011-04-14  7:07                           ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-14  7:13                             ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-14  7:19                               ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-18 13:38                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-04-18 16:33                               ` Ed W
2011-04-19  1:12                                 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-19  9:03                                   ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-19 16:10                                     ` Ed W
2011-04-20  1:26                                       ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-20  6:41                                         ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-20  7:31                                           ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2011-04-20  8:54                                             ` Ed W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTik3=XWQHH9au7434RTJuf_Rg2sYSw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=zenczykowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=lists@wildgooses.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).