From: "Maciej Żenczykowski" <zenczykowski@gmail.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue due to constant "modprobes"
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:10:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik3=XWQHH9au7434RTJuf_Rg2sYSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1104100022500.27387@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
I should probably point out that iptables module autoloading behaviour
is very different for a pre-my commit statically compiled, non-shared
iptables binary
vs a post-my commit or non-statically compiled binary.
The modprobe issue would only show up if you had a statically
compiled, non-shared iptables binary.
ie. one where all the extensions were already part of the iptables
binary and would always get initialized at startup (even for iptables
-h).
Basically the problem is when we're doing revision compatibility
testing as part of an extensions init sequence we will modprobe from
userspace.
I believe we always attempt a module load there instead of first
checking for api existence, and modprobing if the API is missing.
The fix would probably be in xtables.c in compatible_revision() to
change everything starting with:
xtables_load_ko(xtables_modprobe_program, true);
into a for loop:
something along the lines of
for (int load = 0; load <= 1; ++load) {
if (load) xtables_load_ko(...);
...
and replace "close(sockfd); return 0;" with "if (load) {
close(sockfd); return 0; }; continue;"
I'll try to write up and maybe even test a real patch tomorrow.
- Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-13 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 23:16 Performance issue due to constant "modprobes" Ed W
2011-04-08 0:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-08 17:11 ` Ed W
2011-04-08 0:47 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-08 17:11 ` Ed W
2011-04-08 19:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-08 23:22 ` Ed W
2011-04-08 23:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-09 20:39 ` Ed W
2011-04-09 22:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-12 21:03 ` Ed W
2011-04-12 22:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 11:08 ` Ed W
2011-04-13 12:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 9:10 ` Maciej Żenczykowski [this message]
2011-04-13 11:35 ` Ed W
2011-04-13 12:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 12:35 ` Ed W
2011-04-13 12:45 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 16:45 ` Ed W
2011-04-13 19:20 ` Mr Dash Four
2011-04-14 7:07 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-14 7:13 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-14 7:19 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-18 13:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-04-18 16:33 ` Ed W
2011-04-19 1:12 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-19 9:03 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-19 16:10 ` Ed W
2011-04-20 1:26 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-20 6:41 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-20 7:31 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2011-04-20 8:54 ` Ed W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTik3=XWQHH9au7434RTJuf_Rg2sYSw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=zenczykowski@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=lists@wildgooses.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).