From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: set skb transport_header before calling sctp_compute_cksum
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:39:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_dUUyECm57EPmqHyQnh-mkVNz5u-0MCrhtpo80PCr51fA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190311110752.GA30241@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:08 PM Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 10:24:34AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=155109395226858&w=2
> > > But from sctp side, Neil preferred sctp_hdr().
> > >
> > > We need to either add skb_set_transport_header() in sctp_s/dnat_handler()
> > > and sctp_manip_pkt(), or bring that patch back?
> > >
> > > Now it seems not good to set skb->transport_header in netfilter code.
> >
> > I think its fine, but I wonder why we need to do it.
> >
> > Since 21d1196a35f5686c4323e42a62fdb4b23b0ab4a3 ipv4 input path sets
> > transport header before netfilter. The only problem is that linear
> > access is illegal without may_pull checks, but in this case the
> > make_writable call takes care of this already.
> >
> Yes, this. It seems to me we should be setting the transport header prior to
> ever getting into the netfilter code, which does imply that we need the may_pull
> check to linearize enough of the packet to do so, just like tcp and udp do.
>
> > So, why was this patch needed?
The issue was reported when going to nf_conntrack by br_netfilter's
bridge-nf-call-iptables, which could be:
br_prerouting->inet_prerouting->
br_forward->inet_forward->
br_postrouting->inet_postrouting
> > If we need it, do we also need to add it in other locations that
> > deal with sctp csum (e.g. in ipvs?).
So ipvs hooks are in inet_local_in/out, sctp_s/dnat_handler() won't
be affected.
But the one in sctp_manip_pkt() that may be in inet_pre/postrouting
will need to set it.
I will post v2 with skb_set_transport_header(skb, dataoff) added in
sctp_manip_pkt().
agreed?
> >
> This is a fair question, and I'm not yet sure of the answer.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Florian
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-12 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-03 8:17 [PATCH net] netfilter: set skb transport_header before calling sctp_compute_cksum Xin Long
2019-03-08 15:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-03-09 9:07 ` Xin Long
2019-03-09 9:24 ` Florian Westphal
2019-03-11 11:07 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-12 8:39 ` Xin Long [this message]
2019-03-12 9:48 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-03-12 11:01 ` Xin Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADvbK_dUUyECm57EPmqHyQnh-mkVNz5u-0MCrhtpo80PCr51fA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).