From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: Missing skb->dst with flow offloading Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 20:14:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180530180547.kn4cikprj7drhlc3@salvia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netdev , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jaap Buurman , openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, WireGuard mailing list , Felix Fietkau To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180530180547.kn4cikprj7drhlc3@salvia> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hey Pablo, On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:05 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > If there a more drivers in-tree that need this, we may add > skb_dst_set_noref() calls to _hook function in the flowtable codebase. Can I, then, take that as an implicit acknowledgement that this observed behavior on OpenWRT is to be expected with the current state of events, and that I should patch my driver accordingly? As one example of this in tree, take a look at vxlan -- it's using it for the mtu/pmtu exactly as WireGuard does. Regards, Jason