From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kristian Evensen Subject: Re: [PATCH libnftables] Add support for ct set Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:19:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1389359425-6837-1-git-send-email-kristian.evensen@gmail.com> <20140110131406.GA8088@macbook.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Netfilter Development Mailing list To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:37299 "EHLO mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877AbaAJNTn (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:19:43 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x10so4588404pdj.33 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:19:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140110131406.GA8088@macbook.localnet> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote: > nftables uses statements for things that don't return a value. I think > it would make sense to keep this consistent. An "set" expression (aka > statement) can never be used in a match, so its something fundamentally > different than an expression. Are you discussing the removal of the union? -Kristian