From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Xiaoyu Du <tingsrain@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch nf-next] IPVS: ICMPv6 checksum calculation
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:25:56 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.1008171143500.2771@u.domain.uli> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100817070036.GB742@verge.net.au>
Hello,
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Simon Horman wrote:
> From: Xiaoyu Du <tingsrain@gmail.com>
>
> Correct the ICMPv6 checksum calculation when IPv6 is is used
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyu Du <tingsrain@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> I wonder if this is -stable or .35 material.
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> index 4f8ddba..124a1ae 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> @@ -638,8 +638,12 @@ void ip_vs_nat_icmp_v6(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>
> /* And finally the ICMP checksum */
> icmph->icmp6_cksum = 0;
> - /* TODO IPv6: is this correct for ICMPv6? */
May be ip_vs_checksum_complete() is not needed here?
Also, skb->csum is not valid for every ip_summed value.
May be we need to apply CHECKSUM_PARTIAL kind of setup for the IPv6.
Such example is net/ipv6/udp.c:udp6_ufo_send_check().
Later dev_queue_xmit() and skb_checksum_help() should take care
for the next steps. Something like this can be tested:
icmph->icmp6_cksum = csum_ipv6_magic(&iph->saddr,
&iph->daddr,
skb->len - icmp_offset, IPPROTO_ICMPV6,
0);
skb->csum_start = skb_network_header(skb) - skb->head +
icmp_offset;
skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct icmp6hdr, icmp6_cksum);
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> ip_vs_checksum_complete(skb, icmp_offset);
> + icmph->icmp6_cksum = csum_ipv6_magic(&iph->saddr,
> + &iph->daddr,
> + skb->len - icmp_offset, IPPROTO_ICMPV6,
> + skb->csum);
> +
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>
> if (inout)
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-17 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 7:00 [patch nf-next] IPVS: ICMPv6 checksum calculation Simon Horman
2010-08-17 9:25 ` Julian Anastasov [this message]
2010-08-18 0:21 ` Simon Horman
2010-08-18 0:26 ` David Miller
2010-08-18 4:20 ` xiaoyu Du
2010-08-18 5:57 ` Simon Horman
2010-08-20 11:14 ` xiaoyu Du
2010-08-20 13:48 ` Julian Anastasov
2010-08-23 2:54 ` xiaoyu Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.1008171143500.2771@u.domain.uli \
--to=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tingsrain@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).