netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Netfilter Devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [nft PATCH v4 08/32] netlink: send bit-length of bitwise binops to kernel
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 18:46:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2FpkkeMF5zzHX7o@azazel.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <You+bsAw2mbUuE6S@salvia>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6069 bytes --]

On 2022-05-23, at 19:03:42 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 01:13:46PM +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> > Some bitwise operations are generated when munging paylod
> > expressions.  During delinearization, we attempt to eliminate these
> > operations.  However, this is done before deducing the byte-order or
> > the correct length in bits of the operands, which means that we
> > don't always handle multi-byte host-endian operations correctly.
> > Therefore, pass the bit-length of these expressions to the kernel in
> > order to have it available during delinearization.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>
> > ---
> >  src/netlink_delinearize.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> >  src/netlink_linearize.c   |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/netlink_delinearize.c b/src/netlink_delinearize.c
> > index a1b00dee209a..733977bc526d 100644
> > --- a/src/netlink_delinearize.c
> > +++ b/src/netlink_delinearize.c
> > @@ -451,20 +451,28 @@ static struct expr *netlink_parse_bitwise_bool(struct netlink_parse_ctx *ctx,
> >  					       const struct nftnl_expr *nle,
> >  					       enum nft_registers sreg,
> >  					       struct expr *left)
> > -
> >  {
> >  	struct nft_data_delinearize nld;
> >  	struct expr *expr, *mask, *xor, *or;
> > +	unsigned int nbits;
> >  	mpz_t m, x, o;
> >
> >  	expr = left;
> >
> > +	nbits = nftnl_expr_get_u32(nle, NFTNL_EXPR_BITWISE_NBITS);
> > +	if (nbits > 0)
> > +		expr->len = nbits;
>
> So NFTNL_EXPR_BITWISE_NBITS is signalling that this is an implicit
> bitwise that has been generated to operate with a payload header
> bitfield?
>
> Could you provide an example expression tree to show how this
> simplifies delinearization?

This rule:

  add rule ip6 t c ct mark set ip6 dscp lshift 2 or 0x10

has the following representation:

  ip6 t c
  [ payload load 2b @ network header + 0 => reg 1 ]
  [ bitwise reg 1 = ( reg 1 & 0x0000c00f ) ^ 0x00000000 ]
  [ bitwise reg 1 = ( reg 1 >> 0x00000006 ) ]
  [ byteorder reg 1 = ntoh(reg 1, 2, 1) ]
  [ bitwise reg 1 = ( reg 1 << 0x00000002 ) ]
  [ bitwise reg 1 = ( reg 1 & 0x00000fef ) ^ 0x00000010 ]
  [ ct set mark with reg 1 ]

This patch is intended to fix a problem with the OR expression:

  [ bitwise reg 1 = ( reg 1 & 0x00000fef ) ^ 0x00000010 ]
  
The expression has length 12 bits.  During linearization the length is
rounded up to 2 bytes.  During delinearization, the length of the
expression is compared to the size of the mask in order to determine
whether the mask can be removed:

  if (left->len > 0 && mpz_scan0(m, 0) == left->len) {
    /* mask encompasses the entire value */
    expr_free(mask);
  } else {
    mpz_set(mask->value, m);
    expr = binop_expr_alloc(loc, OP_AND, expr, mask);
    expr->len = left->len;
  }

Because the length of the expression is now 16 bits, it does not match
the width of the mask and so the mask is retained:

  table ip6 t {
    chain c {
      type filter hook output priority filter; policy accept;
      ct mark set ip6 dscp << 2 & 4095 | 16
    }
  }

> > +
> >  	nld.value = nftnl_expr_get(nle, NFTNL_EXPR_BITWISE_MASK, &nld.len);
> >  	mask = netlink_alloc_value(loc, &nld);
> > +	if (nbits > 0)
> > +		mpz_switch_byteorder(mask->value, div_round_up(nbits, BITS_PER_BYTE));
>
> What is the byteorder expected for the mask before this switch
> operation?

NBO.

> >  	mpz_init_set(m, mask->value);
> >
> >  	nld.value = nftnl_expr_get(nle, NFTNL_EXPR_BITWISE_XOR, &nld.len);
> > -	xor  = netlink_alloc_value(loc, &nld);
> > +	xor = netlink_alloc_value(loc, &nld);
> > +	if (nbits > 0)
> > +		mpz_switch_byteorder(xor->value, div_round_up(nbits, BITS_PER_BYTE));
> >  	mpz_init_set(x, xor->value);
> >
> >  	mpz_init_set_ui(o, 0);
> > @@ -500,6 +508,8 @@ static struct expr *netlink_parse_bitwise_bool(struct netlink_parse_ctx *ctx,
> >
> >  		or = netlink_alloc_value(loc, &nld);
> >  		mpz_set(or->value, o);
> > +		if (nbits > 0)
> > +			mpz_switch_byteorder(or->value, div_round_up(nbits, BITS_PER_BYTE));
> >  		expr = binop_expr_alloc(loc, OP_OR, expr, or);
> >  		expr->len = left->len;
> >  	}
> > diff --git a/src/netlink_linearize.c b/src/netlink_linearize.c
> > index c8bbcb7452b0..4793f3853bee 100644
> > --- a/src/netlink_linearize.c
> > +++ b/src/netlink_linearize.c
> > @@ -677,6 +677,8 @@ static void netlink_gen_bitwise(struct netlink_linearize_ctx *ctx,
> >  	netlink_put_register(nle, NFTNL_EXPR_BITWISE_DREG, dreg);
> >  	nftnl_expr_set_u32(nle, NFTNL_EXPR_BITWISE_OP, NFT_BITWISE_BOOL);
> >  	nftnl_expr_set_u32(nle, NFTNL_EXPR_BITWISE_LEN, len);
> > +	if (expr->byteorder == BYTEORDER_HOST_ENDIAN)
> > +		nftnl_expr_set_u32(nle, NFTNL_EXPR_BITWISE_NBITS, expr->len);
>
> Why is this only required for host endian expressions?

I wasn't sure whether keeping track of the bit length by storing it in
the kernel would be an acceptable solution.  Doing it for both byte-
orders caused failures in unrelated test-cases.  Since NBO expressions
don't come up in my use-case I decided to restrict it to HBO to start
with, and, if copying the bit-length to and from the kernel *was*
acceptable, to fix those test-failures in the next version of the
patch-set (I assumed one would be required :)).

However, in the process of replying to the questions in your response to
patch 13, I have realized that this patch may not be necessary after
all.  The problem here lies in the code which attempts to turn a mask-
and-xor expression back into the corresponding original bitwise opera-
tion.  A different solution would be to make use of the native bitwise
operations introduced by this series to avoid having to convert to and
from mask-and-xor expressions altogether.  Further explanation in the
later reply.

J.

> >  	netlink_gen_raw_data(mask, expr->byteorder, len, &nld);
> >  	nftnl_expr_set(nle, NFTNL_EXPR_BITWISE_MASK, nld.value, nld.len);
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-04 12:13 [nft PATCH v4 00/32] Extend values assignable to packet marks and payload fields Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 01/32] examples: add .gitignore file Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-05 11:26   ` Florian Westphal
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 02/32] include: add missing `#include` Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 03/32] src: move `byteorder_names` array Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 04/32] datatype: support `NULL` symbol-tables when printing constants Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 05/32] ct: support `NULL` symbol-tables when looking up labels Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-05 11:15   ` Florian Westphal
2022-04-05 15:29     ` Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 06/32] include: update nf_tables.h Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 07/32] include: add new bitwise bit-length attribute to nf_tables.h Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 08/32] netlink: send bit-length of bitwise binops to kernel Jeremy Sowden
2022-05-23 17:03   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-11-01 18:46     ` Jeremy Sowden [this message]
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 09/32] netlink_delinearize: add postprocessing for payload binops Jeremy Sowden
2022-05-23 17:19   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-11-01 18:46     ` Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 10/32] netlink_delinearize: correct type and byte-order of shifts Jeremy Sowden
2022-05-23 17:19   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-11-01 18:47     ` Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 11/32] netlink_delinearize: correct length of right bitwise operand Jeremy Sowden
2022-05-23 17:22   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-11-01 18:47     ` Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 12/32] payload: set byte-order when completing expression Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 13/32] evaluate: support shifts larger than the width of the left operand Jeremy Sowden
2022-05-23 17:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-11-01 18:47     ` Jeremy Sowden
2023-02-07 12:05     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-03-04 12:00       ` Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 14/32] evaluate: relax type-checking for integer arguments in mark statements Jeremy Sowden
2022-05-23 17:33   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 15/32] tests: shell: rename some test-cases Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 16/32] tests: shell: add test-cases for ct and packet mark payload expressions Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 17/32] tests: py: " Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 18/32] include: add new bitwise boolean attributes to nf_tables.h Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 19/32] evaluate: don't eval unary arguments Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 20/32] evaluate: prevent nested byte-order conversions Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:13 ` [nft PATCH v4 21/32] evaluate: don't clobber binop lengths Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 22/32] evaluate: insert byte-order conversions for expressions between 9 and 15 bits Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 23/32] evaluate: set eval context to leftmost bitwise operand Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 24/32] netlink_delinearize: fix typo Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 25/32] netlink_delinearize: refactor stmt_payload_binop_postprocess Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 26/32] netlink_delinearize: add support for processing variable payload statement arguments Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 27/32] netlink: rename bitwise operation functions Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 28/32] netlink: support (de)linearization of new bitwise boolean operations Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 29/32] parser_json: allow RHS ct, meta and payload expressions Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 30/32] evaluate: allow binop expressions with variable right-hand operands Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 31/32] tests: shell: add tests for binops with variable RHS operands Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-04 12:14 ` [nft PATCH v4 32/32] tests: py: " Jeremy Sowden
2022-04-09  8:30 ` [nft PATCH v4 00/32] Extend values assignable to packet marks and payload fields Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2FpkkeMF5zzHX7o@azazel.net \
    --to=jeremy@azazel.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).