From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
claudio.porfiri@ericsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: conntrack: add sctp DATA_SENT state
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:27:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4eShs1cQ7V0mk9n@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221104171835.1224-1-sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 06:18:35PM +0100, Sriram Yagnaraman wrote:
> Changes since v2:
> - Abandoned the sctp no_random_port patch from the series
>
> SCTP conntrack currently assumes that the SCTP endpoints will
> probe secondary paths using HEARTBEAT before sending traffic.
>
> But, according to RFC 9260, SCTP endpoints can send any traffic
> on any of the confirmed paths after SCTP association is up.
> SCTP endpoints that sends INIT will confirm all peer addresses
> that upper layer configures, and the SCTP endpoint that receives
> COOKIE_ECHO will only confirm the address it sent the INIT_ACK to.
>
> So, we can have a situation where the INIT sender can start to
> use secondary paths without the need to send HEARTBEAT. This patch
> allows DATA/SACK packets to create new connection tracking entry.
>
> A new state has been added to indicate that a DATA/SACK chunk has
> been seen in the original direction - SCTP_CONNTRACK_DATA_SENT.
> State transitions mostly follows the HEARTBEAT_SENT, except on
> receiving HEARTBEAT/HEARTBEAT_ACK/DATA/SACK in the reply direction.
>
> State transitions in original direction:
> - DATA_SENT behaves similar to HEARTBEAT_SENT for all chunks,
> except that it remains in DATA_SENT on receving HEARTBEAT,
> HEARTBEAT_ACK/DATA/SACK chunks
> State transitions in reply direction:
> - DATA_SENT behaves similar to HEARTBEAT_SENT for all chunks,
> except that it moves to HEARTBEAT_ACKED on receiving
> HEARTBEAT/HEARTBEAT_ACK/DATA/SACK chunks
>
> Note: This patch still doesn't solve the problem when the SCTP
> endpoint decides to use primary paths for association establishment
> but uses a secondary path for association shutdown. We still have
> to depend on timeout for connections to expire in such a case.
Applied, thanks
One request of mine: Would you send a patch to extend
Documentation/networking/nf_conntrack-sysctl.rst
to document sctp timeouts?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-30 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 17:18 [PATCH v3] netfilter: conntrack: add sctp DATA_SENT state Sriram Yagnaraman
2022-11-30 17:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2022-12-01 9:23 ` Sriram Yagnaraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y4eShs1cQ7V0mk9n@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=claudio.porfiri@ericsson.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).