netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>,
	Long Xin <lxin@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Porfiri <claudio.porfiri@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] netfilter: conntrack: unify established states for SCTP paths
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:28:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8gQIUaGTnbS5mEN@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230118113853.8067-5-sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:38:53PM +0100, Sriram Yagnaraman wrote:
> An SCTP endpoint can start an association through a path and tear it
> down over another one. That means the initial path will not see the
> shutdown sequence, and the conntrack entry will remain in ESTABLISHED
> state for 5 days.
> 
> By merging the HEARTBEAT_ACKED and ESTABLISHED states into one
> ESTABLISHED state, there remains no difference between a primary or
> secondary path. The timeout for the merged ESTABLISHED state is set to
> 210 seconds (hb_interval * max_path_retrans + rto_max). So, even if a
> path doesn't see the shutdown sequence, it will expire in a reasonable
> amount of time.

Thanks for new patchset version. One question below.

> @@ -523,8 +512,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_sctp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
>  
>  	nf_ct_refresh_acct(ct, ctinfo, skb, timeouts[new_state]);
>  
> -	if (old_state == SCTP_CONNTRACK_COOKIE_ECHOED &&
> -	    dir == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY &&
> +	if (dir == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY &&
>  	    new_state == SCTP_CONNTRACK_ESTABLISHED) {
>  		pr_debug("Setting assured bit\n");
>  		set_bit(IPS_ASSURED_BIT, &ct->status);

Why old_state == SCTP_CONNTRACK_COOKIE_ECHOED was removed to set on
the assured bit?

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-18 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-18 11:38 [PATCH v3 0/4] sctp conntrack fixes Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-18 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] netfilter: conntrack: fix vtag checks for ABORT/SHUTDOWN_COMPLETE Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-18 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] netfilter: conntrack: fix bug in for_each_sctp_chunk Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-18 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Revert "netfilter: conntrack: add sctp DATA_SENT state" Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-18 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] netfilter: conntrack: unify established states for SCTP paths Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-18 15:28   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2023-01-19  8:27     ` Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-19 10:48       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y8gQIUaGTnbS5mEN@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=claudio.porfiri@ericsson.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=lxin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).