netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iptables PATCH] tests: iptables-test: Support variant deviation
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:22:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgPOLCfMDlej/bvP@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YgPLnk/AFfRhOADQ@salvia>

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 03:11:42PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 06:55:20PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Some test results are not consistent between variants:
> > 
> > * CLUSTERIP is not supported with nft_compat, so all related tests fail
> >   with iptables-nft.
> > * iptables-legacy mandates TCPMSS be combined with SYN flag match,
> >   iptables-nft does not care. (Or precisely, xt_TCPMSS.ko can't validate
> >   match presence.)
> > 
> > Avoid the expected failures by allowing "NFT" and "LGC" outcomes in
> > addition to "OK" and "FAIL". They specify the variant with which given
> > test should pass.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> > ---
> >  extensions/libipt_CLUSTERIP.t | 4 ++--
> >  extensions/libxt_TCPMSS.t     | 2 +-
> >  iptables-test.py              | 7 +++++--
> >  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/extensions/libipt_CLUSTERIP.t b/extensions/libipt_CLUSTERIP.t
> > index 5af555e005c1d..d3a2d6cbb1b2e 100644
> > --- a/extensions/libipt_CLUSTERIP.t
> > +++ b/extensions/libipt_CLUSTERIP.t
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> >  :INPUT
> >  -d 10.31.3.236/32 -i lo -j CLUSTERIP --new --hashmode sourceip --clustermac 01:AA:7B:47:F7:D7 --total-nodes 2 --local-node 0 --hash-init 1;=;FAIL
> > --d 10.31.3.236/32 -i lo -j CLUSTERIP --new --hashmode sourceip --clustermac 01:AA:7B:47:F7:D7 --total-nodes 2 --local-node 1 --hash-init 1;=;OK
> 
> Could you add a new semicolon to the test line instead?
> 
> --d 10.31.3.236/32 -i lo -j CLUSTERIP --new --hashmode sourceip --clustermac 01:AA:7B:47:F7:D7 --total-nodes 2 --local-node 1 --hash-init 1;=;OK;LEGACY

Sure, will do. It means we'll have semantical aliases:

- ...;OK;LEGAY == ...;FAIL;NFT
- ...;OK:NFT == ...;FAIL;LEGACY

Not a real issue, though.

Thanks, Phil

      reply	other threads:[~2022-02-09 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04 17:55 [iptables PATCH] tests: iptables-test: Support variant deviation Phil Sutter
2022-02-09 14:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 14:22   ` Phil Sutter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YgPOLCfMDlej/bvP@orbyte.nwl.cc \
    --to=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).