From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, kadlec@netfilter.org,
fw@strlen.de, ozsh@nvidia.com, paulb@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] netfilter: introduce total count of hw offloaded flow table entries
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 22:47:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiZ9fQ8oMSOn5Su2@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220222151003.2136934-3-vladbu@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 05:09:57PM +0200, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> To improve hardware offload debuggability and allow capping total amount of
> offloaded entries in following patch extend struct netns_nftables with
> 'count_hw' counter and expose it to userspace as 'nf_flowtable_count_hw'
> sysctl entry. Increment the counter together with setting NF_FLOW_HW flag
> when scheduling offload add task on workqueue and decrement it after
> successfully scheduling offload del task.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
> ---
> include/net/netns/nftables.h | 1 +
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/netns/nftables.h b/include/net/netns/nftables.h
> index 8c77832d0240..262b8b3213cb 100644
> --- a/include/net/netns/nftables.h
> +++ b/include/net/netns/nftables.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>
> struct netns_nftables {
> u8 gencursor;
> + atomic_t count_hw;
> };
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
> index 3e1afd10a9b6..8cd55d502ffd 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
> @@ -618,6 +618,9 @@ enum nf_ct_sysctl_index {
> #ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL
> NF_SYSCTL_CT_LWTUNNEL,
> #endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_FLOW_TABLE)
> + NF_SYSCTL_CT_COUNT_HW,
> +#endif
>
> __NF_SYSCTL_CT_LAST_SYSCTL,
> };
> @@ -973,6 +976,14 @@ static struct ctl_table nf_ct_sysctl_table[] = {
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = nf_hooks_lwtunnel_sysctl_handler,
> },
> +#endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_FLOW_TABLE)
> + [NF_SYSCTL_CT_COUNT_HW] = {
> + .procname = "nf_flowtable_count_hw",
> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> + .mode = 0444,
> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> + },
> #endif
> {}
> };
> @@ -1111,6 +1122,7 @@ static int nf_conntrack_standalone_init_sysctl(struct net *net)
> table[NF_SYSCTL_CT_PROTO_TIMEOUT_UDP_STREAM].data = &un->timeouts[UDP_CT_REPLIED];
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_FLOW_TABLE)
> table[NF_SYSCTL_CT_PROTO_TIMEOUT_UDP_OFFLOAD].data = &un->offload_timeout;
> + table[NF_SYSCTL_CT_COUNT_HW].data = &net->nft.count_hw;
> #endif
>
> nf_conntrack_standalone_init_tcp_sysctl(net, table);
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
> index b90eca7a2f22..9f2b68bc6f80 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
> @@ -315,6 +315,9 @@ int flow_offload_add(struct nf_flowtable *flow_table, struct flow_offload *flow)
> nf_ct_offload_timeout(flow->ct);
>
> if (nf_flowtable_hw_offload(flow_table)) {
> + struct net *net = read_pnet(&flow_table->net);
> +
> + atomic_inc(&net->nft.count_hw);
> __set_bit(NF_FLOW_HW, &flow->flags);
> nf_flow_offload_add(flow_table, flow);
Better increment this new counter from flow_offload_work_add()? There
is offload->flowtable->net, you could use it from there to bump the
counter once this is placed in hardware (by when IPS_HW_OFFLOAD_BIT is
set on).
That also moves the atomic would be away from the packet path.
> }
> @@ -462,10 +465,15 @@ static void nf_flow_offload_gc_step(struct flow_offload *flow, void *data)
>
> if (test_bit(NF_FLOW_TEARDOWN, &flow->flags)) {
> if (test_bit(NF_FLOW_HW, &flow->flags)) {
> - if (!test_bit(NF_FLOW_HW_DYING, &flow->flags))
> + if (!test_bit(NF_FLOW_HW_DYING, &flow->flags)) {
> + struct net *net = read_pnet(&flow_table->net);
> +
> nf_flow_offload_del(flow_table, flow);
> - else if (test_bit(NF_FLOW_HW_DEAD, &flow->flags))
> + if (test_bit(NF_FLOW_HW_DYING, &flow->flags))
> + atomic_dec(&net->nft.count_hw);
Same with this, I'd suggest to decrement it from flow_offload_work_del().
> + } else if (test_bit(NF_FLOW_HW_DEAD, &flow->flags)) {
> flow_offload_del(flow_table, flow);
> + }
> } else {
> flow_offload_del(flow_table, flow);
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-07 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-22 15:09 [PATCH net-next 0/8] Conntrack offload debuggability improvements Vlad Buslov
2022-02-22 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] net/sched: act_ct: set 'net' pointer when creating new nf_flow_table Vlad Buslov
2022-03-07 21:09 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-22 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] netfilter: introduce total count of hw offloaded flow table entries Vlad Buslov
2022-03-07 21:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2022-03-12 18:56 ` Vlad Buslov
2022-03-15 10:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-03-15 16:18 ` Vlad Buslov
2022-03-07 21:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-03-12 19:51 ` Vlad Buslov
2022-03-15 10:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-03-15 16:34 ` Vlad Buslov
2022-02-22 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] netfilter: introduce max " Vlad Buslov
2022-03-07 22:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-03-12 19:32 ` Vlad Buslov
2022-02-22 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] netfilter: introduce total count of hw offload 'add' workqueue tasks Vlad Buslov
2022-03-07 22:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-22 15:10 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] netfilter: introduce max " Vlad Buslov
2022-03-07 22:43 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-03-12 19:59 ` Vlad Buslov
2022-02-22 15:10 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] netfilter: introduce total count of hw offload 'del' " Vlad Buslov
2022-02-22 15:10 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] netfilter: introduce total count of hw offload 'stats' wq tasks Vlad Buslov
2022-02-22 15:10 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] netfilter: flowtable: add hardware offload tracepoints Vlad Buslov
2022-03-07 22:49 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-03-12 20:05 ` Vlad Buslov
2022-03-15 10:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-03-15 16:36 ` Vlad Buslov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YiZ9fQ8oMSOn5Su2@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ozsh@nvidia.com \
--cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
--cc=vladbu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).