netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] nft_set_rbtree: Move clauses for expired nodes, last active node as leaf
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:08:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqrzGBGCUlfd63O0@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614115814.61f8c667@elisabeth>

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:58:14AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 11:01:21 +0200
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
[...]
> > That sounds an incremental fix, I prefer this too.
> 
> ...finally posted now.

Thanks.

[...]
> > I don't see how we can obsolete "activate" operation, though, the
> > existing approach works at set element granularity.
> 
> Yes, and that's what I'm arguing against: it would be more natural, in
> a transaction, to have a single commit operation for all the elements
> at hand -- otherwise it's not so much of a transaction.
> 
> To the user it's atomic (minus bugs) because we have tricks to ensure
> it, but to the set back-ends it's absolutely not. I think we have this
> kind of situation:
> 
> 
> nft            <->     core       <->   set back-end    <->    storage
>                 |                  |                     |
> 
> hash:   transaction commit    element commit       element commit
> 
> rbtree: transaction commit    element commit       element commit
>                                                    ^ problematic to the
>                                                    point we're
>                                                    considering a
>                                                    transaction approach
> 
> pipapo: transaction commit    element commit       transaction commit
> 
> The single advantage I see of the current approach is that with the
> hash back-ends we don't need two copies of the hash table, but that
> also has the downside of the nft_set_elem_active(&he->ext, genmask)
> check in the lookup function, which should be, in relative terms, even
> more expensive than it is in the pipapo implementation, given that hash
> back-ends are (in most cases) faster.

There is also runtime set updates from packet path. In that case, we
cannot keep a copy of the data structure that is being updated from
the control plane while the packet path is also adding/deleting
entries from it.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-16  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-12 18:34 [PATCH nf] nft_set_rbtree: Move clauses for expired nodes, last active node as leaf Stefano Brivio
2022-05-16 18:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-17 12:57   ` Stefano Brivio
2022-05-20 15:45     ` Stefano Brivio
2022-05-23 14:59       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-25 12:15         ` Stefano Brivio
2022-06-01 11:15           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-06-03 13:04             ` Stefano Brivio
2022-06-06  9:01               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-06-14  9:58                 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-06-16  9:08                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YqrzGBGCUlfd63O0@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).